Toward Cybersecurity-Expert Small Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are transforming everyday applications, yet deployment in cybersecurity lags due to a lack of high-quality, domain-specific models and training datasets. To address this gap, we present CyberPal 2.0, a family of cybersecurity-expert small language models (SLMs) ranging from 4B-20B parameters. To train CyberPal 2.0, we generate an enriched chain-of-thought cybersecurity instruction dataset built with our data enrichment and formatting pipeline, SecKnowledge 2.0, which integrates expert-in-the-loop steering of reasoning formats alongside LLM-driven multi-step grounding, yielding higher-fidelity, task-grounded reasoning traces for security tasks. Across diverse cybersecurity benchmarks, CyberPal 2.0 consistently outperforms its baselines and matches or surpasses various open and closed-source frontier models, while remaining a fraction of their size. On core cyber threat intelligence knowledge tasks, our models outperform almost all tested frontier models, ranking second only to Sec-Gemini v1. On core threat-investigation tasks, such as correlating vulnerabilities and bug tickets with weaknesses, our best 20B-parameter model outperforms GPT-4o, o1, o3-mini, and Sec-Gemini v1, ranking first, while our smallest 4B-parameter model ranks second.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.
Builds on
34 of 51 references.
References · 34
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 675
- 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
- 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 506
22 more
- 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantizationcited by 395
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
- 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 254
- 2023Orca 2: Teaching Small Language Models How to Reasoncited by 157
- 2023Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 130
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 70
- 2024Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 65
- 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 61
- 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
- 2024Instruction Tuning With Loss Over Instructionscited by 40
- 2024Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: State-of-the-Artcited by 34
- 2025Recycling the Web: A Method to Enhance Pre-training Data Quality and Quantity for Language Modelscited by 31
- 2024Instruction Fine-Tuning: Does Prompt Loss Matter?cited by 26
- 2025Primus: A Pioneering Collection of Open-Source Datasets for Cybersecurity LLM Trainingcited by 23
- 2025Llama-3.1-FoundationAI-SecurityLLM-8B-Instruct Technical Reportcited by 21
- 2024Reformatted Alignmentcited by 15
- 2025IRCopilot: Automated Incident Response with Large Language Modelscited by 13
- 2024CyberPal.AI: Empowering LLMs with Expert-Driven Cybersecurity Instructionscited by 12
- 2025CyberSOCEval: Benchmarking LLMs Capabilities for Malware Analysis and Threat Intelligence Reasoningcited by 12
- 2024CataractBot: An LLM-Powered Expert-in-the-Loop Chatbot for Cataract Patientscited by 9
- 2025Systematic Characterization of LLM Quantization: A Performance, Energy, and Quality Perspectivecited by 8
- 2024MixPE: Quantization and Hardware Co-design for Efficient LLM Inferencecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Minerva: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards for Cyber Threat Intelligence LLMscited by 2
- 2026To Defend Against Cyber Attacks, We Must Teach AI Agents to Hackcited by 1
- 2026Small, Free, and Effective: Orchestrating Open-Weight Small Language Models to Outperform Single LLM for Malware Analysiscited by 1
- 2026Small, Free, and Effective: Orchestrating Open-Weight Small Language Models to Outperform Single LLM for Malware Analysis22 Jul 2026
- 2026To Defend Against Cyber Attacks, We Must Teach AI Agents to Hack1 Feb 2026
- 2026Minerva: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards for Cyber Threat Intelligence LLMs31 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Less Data, More Security: Advancing Cybersecurity LLMs Specialization via Resource-Efficient Domain-Adaptive Continuous Pre-training with Minimal Tokens
- 2024SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecurity
- 2025AthenaBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence
- 2024Crimson: Empowering Strategic Reasoning in Cybersecurity through Large Language Models
- 2025Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques
- 2023Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2025AttackSeqBench: Benchmarking the Capabilities of LLMs for Attack Sequences Understanding
- 2025DefenderBench: A Toolkit for Evaluating Language Agents in Cybersecurity Environments