mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Anchor-based Maximum Discrepancy for Relative Similarity Testing

arXiv 2510.10477 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The relative similarity testing aims to determine which of the distributions, P or Q, is closer to an anchor distribution U. Existing kernel-based approaches often test the relative similarity with a fixed kernel in a manually specified alternative hypothesis, e.g., Q is closer to U than P. Although kernel selection is known to be important to kernel-based testing methods, the manually specified hypothesis poses a significant challenge for kernel selection in relative similarity testing: Once the hypothesis is specified first, we can always find a kernel such that the hypothesis is rejected. This challenge makes relative similarity testing ill-defined when we want to select a good kernel after the hypothesis is specified. In this paper, we cope with this challenge via learning a proper hypothesis and a kernel simultaneously, instead of learning a kernel after manually specifying the hypothesis. We propose an anchor-based maximum discrepancy (AMD), which defines the relative similarity as the maximum discrepancy between the distances of (U, P) and (U, Q) in a space of deep kernels. Based on AMD, our testing incorporates two phases. In Phase I, we estimate the AMD over the deep kernel space and infer the potential hypothesis. In Phase II, we assess the statistical significance of the potential hypothesis, where we propose a unified testing framework to derive thresholds for tests over different possible hypotheses from Phase I. Lastly, we validate our method theoretically and demonstrate its effectiveness via extensive experiments on benchmark datasets. Codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/zhijianzhouml/AMD.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2025.

Builds on

32 of 61 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2016Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Residual Transfer Networkscited by 340
  4. 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
  5. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
  6. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
  7. 2016Generative Models and Model Criticism via Optimized Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 99
  8. 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 74
  9. 2016Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Powercited by 63
  10. 2015Fast Two-Sample Testing with Analytic Representations of Probability Measurescited by 53
  11. 2020Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attackscited by 44
  12. 2016Classification accuracy as a proxy for two sample testingcited by 39
20 more
  1. 2025Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?cited by 36
  2. 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
  3. 2020A Kernel Two-Sample Test for Functional Datacited by 27
  4. 2022Efficient Aggregated Kernel Tests using Incomplete U-statisticscited by 27
  5. 2015A Test of Relative Similarity For Model Selection in Generative Modelscited by 25
  6. 2019Classification Logit Two-sample Testing by Neural Networkscited by 25
  7. 2022A Permutation-free Kernel Two-Sample Testcited by 21
  8. 2023Detecting Adversarial Data by Probing Multiple Perturbations Using Expected Perturbation Scorecited by 20
  9. 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts by Multi-Population Aware Optimization for Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 20
  10. 2022AutoML Two-Sample Testcited by 19
  11. 2019A Kernel Stein Test for Comparing Latent Variable Modelscited by 18
  12. 2021Meta Two-Sample Testing: Learning Kernels for Testing with Limited Datacited by 18
  13. 2021TOHAN: A One-step Approach towards Few-shot Hypothesis Adaptationcited by 17
  14. 2019On the Use of Random Forest for Two-Sample Testingcited by 12
  15. 2018Informative Features for Model Comparisoncited by 9
  16. 2019Kernel Stein Tests for Multiple Model Comparisoncited by 9
  17. 2022A kernel Stein test of goodness of fit for sequential modelscited by 9
  18. 2019Comparing distributions: ℓ1 geometry improves kernel two-sample testingcited by 5
  19. 2024A Unified Data Representation Learning for Non-parametric Two-sample Testingcited by 5
  20. 2023Kernel-Based Tests for Likelihood-Free Hypothesis Testingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.