LOTTERY: Learning from Reference-Only Samples in Two-Sample Testing under Size Asymmetry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data-adaptive two-sample testing assesses if two samples come from the same distribution, using a discrepancy learned from the data (e.g., via kernel-based feature representations). Such methods typically rely on data splitting to decouple learning from testing and control type I error. However, this paradigm is ill-suited to few-shot settings with severe sample-size imbalance: abundant reference samples are available, while only a handful of query samples arrive. In this paper, we show how this imbalance can be leveraged constructively. Using abundant reference data, we learn reference-dependent representations that summarize salient structure of the reference distribution and provide informative signals for detecting departures. We incorporate a collection of representation families that capture both global and local structure, and adaptively weight them using only reference samples via an uncertainty-guided principle. Theoretically, we establish permutation-based type I error control and show consistency of the aggregated test: as the sample sizes grow, the test power converges to one whenever the representation set contains at least one consistent representation. Empirically, our aggregation achieves strong performance across a range of benchmarks while retaining type I error control.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.
Builds on
27 of 48 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
- 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 268
- 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
- 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
- 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 130
- 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 127
15 more
- 2020DROCC: Deep Robust One-Class Classificationcited by 121
- 2016Generative Models and Model Criticism via Optimized Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 100
- 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 75
- 2021Deep One-Class Classification via Interpolated Gaussian Descriptorcited by 67
- 2016Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Powercited by 63
- 2020Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attackscited by 44
- 2016Classification accuracy as a proxy for two sample testingcited by 42
- 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
- 2021A Witness Two-Sample Testcited by 23
- 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts by Multi-Population Aware Optimization for Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 20
- 2022CADet: Fully Self-Supervised Out-Of-Distribution Detection With Contrastive Learningcited by 11
- 2024A Unified Data Representation Learning for Non-parametric Two-sample Testingcited by 6
- 2025DUAL: Learning Diverse Kernels for Aggregated Two-sample and Independence Testingcited by 6
- 2025H2ST: Hierarchical Two-Sample Tests for Continual Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 4
- 2025Anchor-based Maximum Discrepancy for Relative Similarity Testingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.