The Role of Feature Interactions in Graph-based Tabular Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate predictions on tabular data rely on capturing complex, dataset-specific feature interactions. Attention-based methods and graph neural networks, referred to as graph-based tabular deep learning (GTDL), aim to improve predictions by modeling these interactions as a graph. In this work, we analyze how these methods model the feature interactions. Current GTDL approaches primarily focus on optimizing predictive accuracy, often neglecting the accurate modeling of the underlying graph structure. Using synthetic datasets with known ground-truth graph structures, we find that current GTDL methods fail to recover meaningful feature interactions, as their edge recovery is close to random. This suggests that the attention mechanism and message-passing schemes used in GTDL do not effectively capture feature interactions. Furthermore, when we impose the true interaction structure, we find that the predictive accuracy improves. This highlights the need for GTDL methods to prioritize accurate modeling of the graph structure, as it leads to better predictions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.
Builds on
44 of 69 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
32 more
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
- 2017Deep & Cross Network for Ad Click Predictionscited by 392
- 2020DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systemscited by 326
- 2018AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networkscited by 319
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
- 2019A Multiscale Visualization of Attention in the Transformer Modelcited by 292
- 2018xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systemscited by 277
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
- 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 267
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
- 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 198
- 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
- 2021Self-Attention Between Datapoints: Going Beyond Individual Input-Output Pairs in Deep Learningcited by 112
- 2024RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databasescited by 90
- 2020Tabular Transformers for Modeling Multivariate Time Seriescited by 77
- 2025LimiX: Unleashing Structured-Data Modeling Capability for Generalist Intelligencecited by 65
- 2023Relational Deep Learning: Graph Representation Learning on Relational Databasescited by 55
- 2019Fi-GNN: Modeling Feature Interactions via Graph Neural Networks for CTR Predictioncited by 54
- 2022T2G-Former: Organizing Tabular Features into Relation Graphs Promotes Heterogeneous Feature Interactioncited by 41
- 2025Relational Graph Transformercited by 30
- 2025Transformers are Graph Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2021ARM-Net: Adaptive Relation Modeling Network for Structured Datacited by 24
- 2023Harmonics of Learning: Universal Fourier Features Emerge in Invariant Networkscited by 23
- 2024Graph Neural Networks for Tabular Data Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy and Directionscited by 13
- 2023Observatory: Characterizing Embeddings of Relational Tablescited by 12
- 2024Attention Meets Post-hoc Interpretability: A Mathematical Perspectivecited by 11
- 2023Graph Neural Network contextual embedding for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 8
- 2015BDgraph: An R Package for Bayesian Structure Learning in Graphical Modelscited by 4
- 2023Bayesian Structure Learning in Undirected Gaussian Graphical Models: Literature Review with Empirical Comparisoncited by 3
- 2024The Good, The Efficient and the Inductive Biases: Exploring Efficiency in Deep Learning Through the Use of Inductive Biasescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.