mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Observatory: Characterizing Embeddings of Relational Tables

arXiv 2310.07736 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2023cs.DB cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models and specialized table embedding models have recently demonstrated strong performance on many tasks over tabular data. Researchers and practitioners are keen to leverage these models in many new application contexts; but limited understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these models, and the table representations they generate, makes the process of finding a suitable model for a given task reliant on trial and error. There is an urgent need to gain a comprehensive understanding of these models to minimize inefficiency and failures in downstream usage. To address this need, we propose Observatory, a formal framework to systematically analyze embedding representations of relational tables. Motivated both by invariants of the relational data model and by statistical considerations regarding data distributions, we define eight primitive properties, and corresponding measures to quantitatively characterize table embeddings for these properties. Based on these properties, we define an extensible framework to evaluate language and table embedding models. We collect and synthesize a suite of datasets and use Observatory to analyze nine such models. Our analysis provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of learned representations over tables. We find, for example, that some models are sensitive to table structure such as column order, that functional dependencies are rarely reflected in embeddings, and that specialized table embedding models have relatively lower sample fidelity. Such insights help researchers and practitioners better anticipate model behaviors and select appropriate models for their downstream tasks, while guiding researchers in the development of new models.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2023.

Builds on

32 of 60 references.

References · 32

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  5. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  6. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  7. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  8. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  9. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
  10. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  11. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  12. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 233
20 more
  1. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  2. 2022Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?cited by 173
  3. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 143
  4. 2020TUTA: Tree-based Transformers for Generally Structured Table Pre-trainingcited by 100
  5. 2019Sherlock: A Deep Learning Approach to Semantic Data Type Detectioncited by 73
  6. 2023Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Predictioncited by 55
  7. 2023Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustnesscited by 50
  8. 2022Table Pre-training: A Survey on Model Architectures, Pre-training Objectives, and Downstream Taskscited by 42
  9. 2023RobuT: A Systematic Study of Table QA Robustness Against Human-Annotated Adversarial Perturbationscited by 41
  10. 2021Annotating Columns with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 37
  11. 2018Factors Influencing the Surprising Instability of Word Embeddingscited by 31
  12. 2020Dataset Discovery in Data Lakescited by 31
  13. 2020RPT: Relational Pre-trained Transformer Is Almost All You Need towards Democratizing Data Preparationcited by 27
  14. 2016LSH Ensemble: Internet-Scale Domain Searchcited by 24
  15. 2023CHORUS: Foundation Models for Unified Data Discovery and Explorationcited by 24
  16. 2023Column Type Annotation using ChatGPTcited by 18
  17. 2022WarpGate: A Semantic Join Discovery System for Cloud Data Warehousescited by 13
  18. 2022Table Retrieval May Not Necessitate Table-specific Model Designcited by 11
  19. 2023Pylon: Semantic Table Union Search in Data Lakescited by 9
  20. 2023LakeBench: Benchmarks for Data Discovery over Data Lakescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

12 papers.