mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Turning Drift into Constraint: Robust Reasoning Alignment in Non-Stationary Multi-Stream Environments

arXiv 2510.04142 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

This paper identifies a critical yet underexplored challenge in reasoning alignment from multiple multi-modal large language models (MLLMs): In non-stationary environments, the diverse reasoning distributions of source models often evolve unpredictably, transmitting systematic biases and drift to the target model. To address this, we formulate multi-source reasoning alignment as a constraint satisfaction problem under concept drift theory. We propose Autonomous Preference Optimization (APO), a novel framework that treats inter-model divergences not as noise, but as dynamic negative constraints. APO operates via a two-stage protocol: first, supervised bootstrapping projects the target model into the capability union of source models; second, constraint-aware optimization synthesizes a consistent consensus manifold by explicitly suppressing drifting trajectories via a multi-negative Plackett-Luce objective. Extensive experiments on chest X-ray interpretation demonstrate that our 7B model achieves superior robustness, outperforming even proprietary source models in average accuracy. Furthermore, we release CXR-MAX, a large-scale benchmark comprising 170,982 reasoning trajectories from seven large-scale MLLMs to facilitate research on reasoning alignment under drift. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/XiaoyuYoung/APO.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

Builds on

15 of 100 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  4. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  6. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  7. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  8. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  9. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  10. 2025Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 501
  11. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
  12. 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
3 more
  1. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
  2. 2021Chest ImaGenome Dataset for Clinical Reasoningcited by 89
  3. 2025Multi-MLLM Knowledge Distillation for Out-of-Context News Detectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From Noisy Traces to Stable Gradients: Bias-Variance Optimized Preference Optimization for Aligning Large Reasoning Models
  2. 2026Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces
  3. 2025DRIFT: Transferring Reasoning Priors for Efficient MLLM Fine-Tuning
  4. 2026Not All Preferences Deserve Gradients: Understanding Gradient Utility in Offline Reasoning Alignment
  5. 2026Confidence-Aware Alignment Makes Reasoning LLMs More Reliable
  6. 2026Dual-Dimensional Consistency: Balancing Budget and Quality in Adaptive Inference-Time Scaling
  7. 2025Walking the Tightrope: Disentangling Beneficial and Detrimental Drifts in Non-Stationary Custom-Tuning
  8. 2026Atlas: Orchestrating Heterogeneous Models and Tools for Multi-Domain Complex Reasoning