AIReg-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models That Assess AI Regulation Compliance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As governments move to regulate AI, there is growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to assess whether or not an AI system complies with a given AI Regulation (AIR). However, there is presently no way to benchmark the performance of LLMs at this task. To fill this void, we introduce AIReg-Bench: the first open benchmark dataset designed to test how well LLMs can assess compliance with the EU AI Act (AIA). We created this dataset through a two-step process: (1) by prompting an LLM with carefully structured instructions, we generated 120 technical documentation excerpts (samples), each depicting a fictional, albeit plausible, AI system -- of the kind an AI provider might produce to demonstrate their compliance with AIR; (2) legal experts then reviewed and annotated each sample to indicate whether, and in what way, the AI system described therein violates specific Articles of the AIA. The resulting dataset, together with our evaluation of whether frontier LLMs can reproduce the experts' compliance labels, provides a starting point to understand the opportunities and limitations of LLM-based AIR compliance assessment tools and establishes a benchmark against which subsequent LLMs can be compared. The dataset and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/camlsys/aireg-bench.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
52 of 122 references.
References · 52
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 232
- 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 170
- 2024Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2024SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Lawcited by 136
- 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 113
- 2023LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Modelscited by 111
- 2025The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMscited by 72
- 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
38 more
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 57
- 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domaincited by 56
- 2023Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystemcited by 49
- 2022Multi-LexSum: Real-World Summaries of Civil Rights Lawsuits at Multiple Granularitiescited by 47
- 2024SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domaincited by 39
- 2025A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmarkcited by 37
- 2025PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliancecited by 34
- 2023MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understandingcited by 32
- 2024Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmarkcited by 29
- 2024Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systemscited by 27
- 2019CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehensioncited by 26
- 2020A Benchmark for Lease Contract Reviewcited by 26
- 2024COMPL-AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 23
- 2021Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulationcited by 19
- 2022The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI marketcited by 18
- 2025JuDGE: Benchmarking Judgment Document Generation for Chinese Legal Systemcited by 18
- 2025Verifiable Format Control for Large Language Model Generationscited by 16
- 2023One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Supportcited by 15
- 2023How Effective are Large Language Models in Generating Software Specifications?cited by 12
- 2024ExploreGen: Large Language Models for Envisioning the Uses and Risks of AI Technologiescited by 12
- 2025ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Draftingcited by 11
- 2025L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Auditcited by 11
- 2024Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024Co-designing an AI Impact Assessment Report Template with AI Practitioners and AI Compliance Expertscited by 10
- 2025LLM-based HSE Compliance Assessment: Benchmark, Performance, and Advancementscited by 8
- 2025Comparing Apples to Oranges: A Taxonomy for Navigating the Global Landscape of AI Regulationcited by 7
- 2024Caveat Lector: Large Language Models in Legal Practicecited by 6
- 2024Co-Matching: Towards Human-Machine Collaborative Legal Case Matchingcited by 6
- 2025Red Teaming AI Policy: A Taxonomy of Avoision and the EU AI Actcited by 6
- 2025Bench-2-CoP: Can We Trust Benchmarking for EU AI Compliance?cited by 6
- 2024Legal Documents Drafting with Fine-Tuned Pre-Trained Large Language Modelcited by 5
- 2024From Principles to Rules: A Regulatory Approach for Frontier AIcited by 5
- 2024NLP-based Regulatory Compliance -- Using GPT 4.0 to Decode Regulatory Documentscited by 4
- 2024Compliance Cards: Automated EU AI Act Compliance Analyses amidst a Complex AI Supply Chaincited by 3
- 2025Document Retrieval Augmented Fine-Tuning (DRAFT) for safety-critical software assessmentscited by 2
- 2025Let's have a chat with the EU AI Actcited by 2
- 2025Evaluating the Role of Large Language Models in Legal Practice in Indiacited by 2
- 2025InformGen: An AI Copilot for Accurate and Compliant Clinical Research Consent Document Generationcited by 1
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Computational Compliance for AI Regulation: Blueprint for a New Research Domaincited by 1
- 2026PACT: Can Enterprise AI Assistants Be Trusted Under Pressure?cited by 1
- 2026Constraint-Aware Hierarchical Search for Regulation-Driven Fine-Grained Classificationcited by 0
- 2026EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance Checkerscited by 0
- 2026An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance Checkers28 Sep 2026
- 2026EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models22 Sep 2026
- 2026PACT: Can Enterprise AI Assistants Be Trusted Under Pressure?16 Sep 2026
- 2026Constraint-Aware Hierarchical Search for Regulation-Driven Fine-Grained Classification12 Jul 2026
- 2026Computational Compliance for AI Regulation: Blueprint for a New Research Domain8 Jan 2026