Optimally Auditing Adversarial Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fraud can pose a challenge in many resource allocation domains, including social service delivery and credit provision. For example, agents may misreport private information in order to gain benefits or access to credit. To mitigate this, a principal can design strategic audits to verify claims and penalize misreporting. In this paper, we introduce a general model of audit policy design as a principal-agent game with multiple agents, where the principal commits to an audit policy, and agents collectively choose an equilibrium that minimizes the principal's utility. We examine both adaptive and non-adaptive settings, depending on whether the principal's policy can be responsive to the distribution of agent reports. Our work provides efficient algorithms for computing optimal audit policies in both settings and extends these results to a setting with limited audit budgets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.
Builds on
5 of 23 references.
References · 5
- 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 128
- 2020Incentivizing Truthfulness Through Audits in Strategic Classificationcited by 8
- 2014Audit Games with Multiple Defender Resourcescited by 4
- 2024Catch Me If You Can: Combatting Fraud in Artificial Currency Based Government Benefits Programscited by 2
- 2025Learning to Play Multi-Follower Bayesian Stackelberg Gamescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.