Learning Privately with Labeled and Unlabeled Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A private learner is an algorithm that given a sample of labeled individual examples outputs a generalizing hypothesis while preserving the privacy of each individual. In 2008, Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) gave a generic construction of private learners, in which the sample complexity is (generally) higher than what is needed for non-private learners. This gap in the sample complexity was then further studied in several followup papers, showing that (at least in some cases) this gap is unavoidable. Moreover, those papers considered ways to overcome the gap, by relaxing either the privacy or the learning guarantees of the learner. We suggest an alternative approach, inspired by the (non-private) models of semi-supervised learning and active-learning, where the focus is on the sample complexity of labeled examples whereas unlabeled examples are of a significantly lower cost. We consider private semi-supervised learners that operate on a random sample, where only a (hopefully small) portion of this sample is labeled. The learners have no control over which of the sample elements are labeled. Our main result is that the labeled sample complexity of private learners is characterized by the VC dimension. We present two generic constructions of private semi-supervised learners. The first construction is of learners where the labeled sample complexity is proportional to the VC dimension of the concept class, however, the unlabeled sample complexity of the algorithm is as big as the representation length of domain elements. Our second construction presents a new technique for decreasing the labeled sample complexity of a given private learner, while roughly maintaining its unlabeled sample complexity. In addition, we show that in some settings the labeled sample complexity does not depend on the privacy parameters of the learner.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
- 2022~Optimal Differentially Private Learning of Thresholds and Quasi-Concave Optimizationcited by 16
- 2023Private Everlasting Predictioncited by 5
- 2024Oracle-Efficient Differentially Private Learning with Public Datacited by 5
- 2021On the Sample Complexity of Privately Learning Axis-Aligned Rectanglescited by 2
- 2024Improved Bounds for Pure Private Agnostic Learning: Item-Level and User-Level Privacycited by 1
- 2025Private Online Learning against an Adaptive Adversary: Realizable and Agnostic Settingscited by 1
- 2025Private Realizable-to-Agnostic Transformation with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 1
- 2026Private Prediction via Shrinkagecited by 0
- 2026Private Prediction via Shrinkage5 Feb 2026
- 2025Private Realizable-to-Agnostic Transformation with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity1 Oct 2025
- 2025Private Online Learning against an Adaptive Adversary: Realizable and Agnostic Settings1 Oct 2025
- 2024Improved Bounds for Pure Private Agnostic Learning: Item-Level and User-Level Privacy30 Jul 2024
- 2024Oracle-Efficient Differentially Private Learning with Public Data13 Feb 2024
- 2023Private Everlasting Prediction16 May 2023
- 2022~Optimal Differentially Private Learning of Thresholds and Quasi-Concave Optimization11 Nov 2022
- 2021Realizable Learning is All You Need8 Nov 2021
- 2021On the Sample Complexity of Privately Learning Axis-Aligned Rectangles24 Jul 2021