mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Muon Optimizer Accelerates Grokking

arXiv 2504.16041 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the impact of different optimizers on the grokking phenomenon, where models exhibit delayed generalization. We conducted experiments across seven numerical tasks (primarily modular arithmetic) using a modern Transformer architecture. The experimental configuration systematically varied the optimizer (Muon vs. AdamW) and the softmax activation function (standard softmax, stablemax, and sparsemax) to assess their combined effect on learning dynamics. Our empirical evaluation reveals that the Muon optimizer, characterized by its use of spectral norm constraints and second-order information, significantly accelerates the onset of grokking compared to the widely used AdamW optimizer. Specifically, Muon reduced the mean grokking epoch from 153.09 to 102.89 across all configurations, a statistically significant difference (t = 5.0175, p = 6.33e-08). This suggests that the optimizer choice plays a crucial role in facilitating the transition from memorization to generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  2. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  3. 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
  4. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 341
  5. 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 230
  6. 2025Grokking at the Edge of Numerical Stabilitycited by 46

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 9.

12 papers.