Muon Optimizer Accelerates Grokking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the impact of different optimizers on the grokking phenomenon, where models exhibit delayed generalization. We conducted experiments across seven numerical tasks (primarily modular arithmetic) using a modern Transformer architecture. The experimental configuration systematically varied the optimizer (Muon vs. AdamW) and the softmax activation function (standard softmax, stablemax, and sparsemax) to assess their combined effect on learning dynamics. Our empirical evaluation reveals that the Muon optimizer, characterized by its use of spectral norm constraints and second-order information, significantly accelerates the onset of grokking compared to the widely used AdamW optimizer. Specifically, Muon reduced the mean grokking epoch from 153.09 to 102.89 across all configurations, a statistically significant difference (t = 5.0175, p = 6.33e-08). This suggests that the optimizer choice plays a crucial role in facilitating the transition from memorization to generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.
Builds on
6 of 13 references.
References · 6
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
- 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 341
- 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 230
- 2025Grokking at the Edge of Numerical Stabilitycited by 46
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 9.
12 papers.
- 2025AdaMuon: Adaptive Muon Optimizercited by 67
- 2026Convergence of Muon with Newton-Schulzcited by 36
- 2026Preconditioning Benefits of Spectral Orthogonalization in Muoncited by 30
- 2025Provable Scaling Laws of Feature Emergence from Learning Dynamics of Grokkingcited by 15
- 2026FISMO: Fisher-Structured Momentum-Orthogonalized Optimizercited by 11
- 2026Spectral Flattening Is All Muon Needs: How Orthogonalization Controls Learning Rate and Convergencecited by 5
- 2025Non-Euclidean Broximal Point Method: A Blueprint for Geometry-Aware Optimizationcited by 4
- 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Boundscited by 2
- 2026Post-Grokking Collapse at the Representation-Readout Interface in Muon-Trained Transformerscited by 2
- 2026Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorizationcited by 1
- 2026The Active Ingredient in Muon's Grokkingcited by 1
- 2026Controlling Polar Exposure to Delay Memorization in Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Controlling Polar Exposure to Delay Memorization in Diffusion Models2 Oct 2026
- 2026Post-Grokking Collapse at the Representation-Readout Interface in Muon-Trained Transformers7 Aug 2026
- 2026Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization14 Jul 2026
- 2026The Active Ingredient in Muon's Grokking6 Jul 2026
- 2026Spectral Flattening Is All Muon Needs: How Orthogonalization Controls Learning Rate and Convergence13 May 2026
- 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Bounds7 May 2026
- 2026FISMO: Fisher-Structured Momentum-Orthogonalized Optimizer29 Jan 2026
- 2026Convergence of Muon with Newton-Schulz27 Jan 2026
- 2026Preconditioning Benefits of Spectral Orthogonalization in Muon20 Jan 2026
- 2025Non-Euclidean Broximal Point Method: A Blueprint for Geometry-Aware Optimization1 Oct 2025
- 2025Provable Scaling Laws of Feature Emergence from Learning Dynamics of Grokking25 Sep 2025
- 2025AdaMuon: Adaptive Muon Optimizer15 Jul 2025