mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

T-POP: Test-Time Personalization with Online Preference Feedback

arXiv 2509.24696 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual user preferences is a critical step beyond generating generically helpful responses. However, current personalization methods are ill-suited for new users, as they typically require either slow, resource-intensive fine-tuning or a substantial amount of pre-existing user data, creating a significant cold-start problem. To address this challenge, we introduce a new paradigm for real-time personalization by learning from online pairwise preference feedback collected during text generation. We propose T-POP (Test-Time Personalization with Online Preference Feedback}), a novel algorithm that synergistically combines test-time alignment with dueling bandits. Without updating the LLM parameters, T-POP steers the decoding process of a frozen LLM by learning a reward function online that captures user preferences. By leveraging dueling bandits, T-POP intelligently queries the user to efficiently balance between exploring their preferences and exploiting the learned knowledge to generate personalized text. Extensive experiments demonstrate that T-POP achieves rapid and data-efficient personalization, significantly outperforming existing baselines and showing consistent improvement with more user interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

40 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025From 1,000,000 Users to Every User: Scaling Up Personalized Preference for User-level Alignment19 Mar
  2. 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization8 Mar
  3. 2024PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Time5 Oct
  4. 2024Personality Alignment of Large Language Models21 Aug
  5. 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalization28 May
  6. 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models24 Apr
  7. 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedback6 Feb
  8. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging17 Oct
  9. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback2 Oct
  10. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback22 May
  11. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedback2 Sep

Other references · 29

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  9. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  10. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  11. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
  12. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Recommender? A Preliminary Studycited by 192
17 more
  1. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 147
  2. 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 127
  3. 2023Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Predictioncited by 113
  4. 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 100
  5. 2024ARGS: Alignment as Reward-Guided Searchcited by 99
  6. 2024Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentationcited by 98
  7. 2023Pearl: Personalizing Large Language Model Writing Assistants with Generation-Calibrated Retrieverscited by 91
  8. 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMscited by 78
  9. 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregationcited by 71
  10. 2024Decoding-time Realignment of Language Modelscited by 67
  11. 2024Persona-DB: Efficient Large Language Model Personalization for Response Prediction with Collaborative Data Refinementcited by 47
  12. 2023Learning to Rewrite Prompts for Personalized Text Generationcited by 40
  13. 2024Prompt Optimization with Human Feedbackcited by 35
  14. 2024Few-shot Personalization of LLMs with Mis-aligned Responsescited by 30
  15. 2025Amulet: ReAlignment During Test Time for Personalized Preference Adaptation of LLMscited by 29
  16. 2024Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedbackcited by 25
  17. 2025Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignmentcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025POPI: Personalizing LLMs via Optimized Natural Language Preference Inference
  2. 2025Personalized LLM Decoding via Contrasting Personal Preference
  3. 2026HyperTrace: Hypothesis-Based Preference Tracing for Online LLM Personalization
  4. 2024Disentangling Preference Representation and Text Generation for Efficient Individual Preference Alignment
  5. 2026Text as a Universal Interface for Transferable Personalization
  6. 2026Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Personalization
  7. 2026Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models
  8. 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences