T-POP: Test-Time Personalization with Online Preference Feedback
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual user preferences is a critical step beyond generating generically helpful responses. However, current personalization methods are ill-suited for new users, as they typically require either slow, resource-intensive fine-tuning or a substantial amount of pre-existing user data, creating a significant cold-start problem. To address this challenge, we introduce a new paradigm for real-time personalization by learning from online pairwise preference feedback collected during text generation. We propose T-POP (Test-Time Personalization with Online Preference Feedback}), a novel algorithm that synergistically combines test-time alignment with dueling bandits. Without updating the LLM parameters, T-POP steers the decoding process of a frozen LLM by learning a reward function online that captures user preferences. By leveraging dueling bandits, T-POP intelligently queries the user to efficiently balance between exploring their preferences and exploiting the learned knowledge to generate personalized text. Extensive experiments demonstrate that T-POP achieves rapid and data-efficient personalization, significantly outperforming existing baselines and showing consistent improvement with more user interactions.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
40 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2025From 1,000,000 Users to Every User: Scaling Up Personalized Preference for User-level Alignment19 Mar
- 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization8 Mar
- 2024PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Time5 Oct
- 2024Personality Alignment of Large Language Models21 Aug
- 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalization28 May
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models24 Apr
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedback6 Feb
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging17 Oct
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback2 Oct
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback22 May
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedback2 Sep
Other references · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Recommender? A Preliminary Studycited by 192
17 more
- 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 147
- 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 127
- 2023Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Predictioncited by 113
- 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 100
- 2024ARGS: Alignment as Reward-Guided Searchcited by 99
- 2024Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentationcited by 98
- 2023Pearl: Personalizing Large Language Model Writing Assistants with Generation-Calibrated Retrieverscited by 91
- 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMscited by 78
- 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregationcited by 71
- 2024Decoding-time Realignment of Language Modelscited by 67
- 2024Persona-DB: Efficient Large Language Model Personalization for Response Prediction with Collaborative Data Refinementcited by 47
- 2023Learning to Rewrite Prompts for Personalized Text Generationcited by 40
- 2024Prompt Optimization with Human Feedbackcited by 35
- 2024Few-shot Personalization of LLMs with Mis-aligned Responsescited by 30
- 2025Amulet: ReAlignment During Test Time for Personalized Preference Adaptation of LLMscited by 29
- 2024Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedbackcited by 25
- 2025Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignmentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Test-Time Personalization: A Diagnostic Framework and Probabilistic Fix for Scaling Failurescited by 0
- 2026Psi-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialoguescited by 0
- 2026Personalizing Large Language Model Agents with Small Policy Modelscited by 0
- 2026WDL-OPD: Weak-Driven On-Policy Distillation via Mixture-Constrained Co-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Personalized Generation: Test-Time Alignment via Factorized Ranking Modelscited by 0
- 2026AdaptArena: Evaluating Test-Time Personalization of Web Agentscited by 0
- 2026AdaptArena: Evaluating Test-Time Personalization of Web Agents29 Sep 2026
- 2026Rethinking Personalized Generation: Test-Time Alignment via Factorized Ranking Models28 Sep 2026
- 2026WDL-OPD: Weak-Driven On-Policy Distillation via Mixture-Constrained Co-Training10 Aug 2026
- 2026Personalizing Large Language Model Agents with Small Policy Models31 Jul 2026
- 2026Psi-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues1 Jun 2026
- 2026Test-Time Personalization: A Diagnostic Framework and Probabilistic Fix for Scaling Failures9 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025POPI: Personalizing LLMs via Optimized Natural Language Preference Inference
- 2025Personalized LLM Decoding via Contrasting Personal Preference
- 2026HyperTrace: Hypothesis-Based Preference Tracing for Online LLM Personalization
- 2024Disentangling Preference Representation and Text Generation for Efficient Individual Preference Alignment
- 2026Text as a Universal Interface for Transferable Personalization
- 2026Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Personalization
- 2026Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models
- 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences