Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce the tokenized linear bandit (TLB) and multi-armed bandit (TMAB), variants of linear and stochastic multi-armed bandit problems inspired by LLM decoding and alignment. In these problems, at each round t ∈ [T], a user submits a query (context), and the decision maker (DM) sequentially selects a token irrevocably from a token set. Once the sequence is complete, the DM observes a random utility from the user, whose expectation is presented by a sequence function mapping the chosen token sequence to a nonnegative real value that depends on the query. In both problems, we first show that learning is impossible without any structure on the sequence function. We introduce a natural assumption, diminishing distance with more commons (DDMC), and propose algorithms with regret tildeO(L√T) and tildeO(L√T2/3) for TLB and TMAB, respectively. As a side product, we obtain an (almost) optimality of the greedy decoding for LLM decoding algorithm under DDMC, which justifies the unresaonable effectiveness of greedy decoding in several tasks. This also has an immediate application to decoding-time LLM alignment, when the misaligned utility can be represented as the frozen LLM's utility and a linearly realizable latent function. We finally validate our algorithm's performance empirically as well as verify our assumptions using synthetic and real-world datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2025.
Builds on
43 of 54 references.
References · 43
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
31 more
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
- 2022InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesiscited by 498
- 2024Break the Sequential Dependency of LLM Inference Using Lookahead Decodingcited by 298
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
- 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
- 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 243
- 2017Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translationcited by 232
- 2021NeuroLogic A*esque Decoding: Constrained Text Generation with Lookahead Heuristicscited by 154
- 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 137
- 2023Controlled Decoding from Language Modelscited by 135
- 2024Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policycited by 124
- 2020If beam search is the answer, what was the question?cited by 116
- 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 116
- 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMscited by 114
- 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectivescited by 94
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 92
- 2024Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFcited by 73
- 2024DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 55
- 2024Transfer Q Star: Principled Decoding for LLM Alignmentcited by 48
- 2024Asymptotics of Language Model Alignmentcited by 47
- 2018Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modelingcited by 44
- 2024Cascade Reward Sampling for Efficient Decoding-Time Alignmentcited by 39
- 2023Closing the Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 32
- 2017Inhomogeneous Hypergraph Clustering with Applicationscited by 31
- 2014Bandit Algorithms for Tree Searchcited by 25
- 2024Large Language Models in Drug Discovery and Development: From Disease Mechanisms to Clinical Trialscited by 24
- 2019Adaptive Sequence Submodularitycited by 8
- 2024Decoding Game: On Minimax Optimality of Heuristic Text Generation Strategiescited by 7
- 2022Language Model Decoding as Likelihood-Utility Alignmentcited by 5
- 2018Submodularity on Hypergraphs: From Sets to Sequencescited by 3
- 2024Inference time LLM alignment in single and multidomain preference spectrumcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Not-a-Bandit: Provably No-Regret Drafter Selection in Speculative Decoding for LLMs
- 2026When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Bandits
- 2026Learning Adaptive LLM Decoding
- 2024Sample-Efficient Alignment for LLMs
- 2025LLM Bandit: Cost-Efficient LLM Generation via Preference-Conditioned Dynamic Routing
- 2025BanditSpec: Adaptive Speculative Decoding via Bandit Algorithms
- 2025TextBandit: Evaluating Probabilistic Reasoning in LLMs Through Language-Only Decision Tasks
- 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlo