mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Personalization

arXiv 2601.12078 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.IRcited by 5

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) excel at general-purpose tasks, yet adapting their responses to individual users remains challenging. Retrieval augmentation provides a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning by conditioning LLMs on user history records, and existing approaches typically select these records based on semantic relevance. We argue that relevance serves as an unreliable proxy for utility: a record may be semantically similar to a query yet fail to improve generation quality or even degrade it due to redundancy or conflicting information. To bridge this gap, we propose PURPLE, a contextual bandit framework that oPtimizes UseR Profiles for LLM pErsonalization. In contrast to a greedy selection of the most relevant records, PURPLE treats profile construction as an order-sensitive generation process and utilizes a Plackett-Luce ranking model to capture complex inter-record dependencies. By training with semantically rich feedback provided by the likelihood of the reference response, our method aligns retrieval directly with generation quality. Extensive experiments on nine personalization tasks demonstrate that PURPLE consistently outperforms strong heuristic and retrieval-augmented baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency, establishing a principled and scalable solution for optimizing user profiles.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 32 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

Builds on

32 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey18 Jul

Other references · 31

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  6. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  8. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
  9. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
  10. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  11. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
  12. 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 792
19 more
  1. 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 702
  2. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  3. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
  4. 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 376
  5. 2023Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Contextcited by 369
  6. 2024RankRAG: Unifying Context Ranking with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMscited by 202
  7. 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 201
  8. 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 178
  9. 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 155
  10. 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 132
  11. 2024LongLaMP: A Benchmark for Personalized Long-form Text Generationcited by 97
  12. 2021The Expando-Mono-Duo Design Pattern for Text Ranking with Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 81
  13. 2024Personalized Pieces: Efficient Personalized Large Language Models through Collaborative Effortscited by 74
  14. 2018Learning a Deep Listwise Context Model for Ranking Refinementcited by 62
  15. 2024FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decodingcited by 54
  16. 2019SetRank: Learning a Permutation-Invariant Ranking Model for Information Retrievalcited by 48
  17. 2024Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankerscited by 43
  18. 2024ListT5: Listwise Reranking with Fusion-in-Decoder Improves Zero-shot Retrievalcited by 30
  19. 2023Scaling Down, LiTting Up: Efficient Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking with Seq2seq Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentation
  2. 2025BESPOKE: Benchmark for Search-Augmented Large Language Model Personalization via Diagnostic Feedback
  3. 2025Personalized Graph-Based Retrieval for Large Language Models
  4. 2023Integrating Summarization and Retrieval for Enhanced Personalization via Large Language Models
  5. 2025Personalize Before Retrieve: LLM-based Personalized Query Expansion for User-Centric Retrieval
  6. 2025Personalize Your LLM: Fake it then Align it
  7. 2024Bridging the Preference Gap between Retrievers and LLMs
  8. 2024Comparing Retrieval-Augmentation and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Privacy-Preserving Personalization of Large Language Models