AutoPrune: Each Complexity Deserves a Pruning Policy
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency
Abstract (arXiv)
The established redundancy in visual tokens within large vision-language models allows pruning to effectively reduce their substantial computational demands. Previous methods typically employ heuristic layer-specific pruning strategies where, although the number of tokens removed may differ across decoder layers, the overall pruning schedule is fixed and applied uniformly to all input samples and tasks, failing to align token elimination with the model's holistic reasoning trajectory. Cognitive science indicates that human visual processing often begins with broad exploration to accumulate evidence before narrowing focus as the target becomes distinct. Our experiments reveal an analogous pattern in these models. This observation suggests that neither a fixed pruning schedule nor a heuristic layer-wise strategy can optimally accommodate the diverse complexities inherent in different inputs. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Complexity-Adaptive Pruning (AutoPrune), a training-free, plug-and-play framework that tailors pruning policies to varying sample and task complexities. Specifically, AutoPrune quantifies the mutual information between visual and textual tokens, then projects this signal to a budget-constrained logistic retention curve. Each such logistic curve, defined by its unique shape, corresponds to the specific complexity of different tasks and can guarantee adherence to predefined computational constraints. We evaluate AutoPrune on standard vision-language tasks and on Vision-Language-Action models for autonomous driving. Notably, when applied to LLaVA-1.5-7B, our method prunes 89% of visual tokens and reduces inference FLOPs by 76.8% while retaining 96.7% of the original accuracy averaged over all tasks. This corresponds to a 9.1% improvement over the recent work PDrop, demonstrating the effectiveness. Code is available at https://github.com/AutoLab-SAI-SJTU/AutoPrune.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.
Builds on
31 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025TopV: Compatible Token Pruning with Inference Time Optimization for Fast and Low-Memory Multimodal Vision Language Model24 Mar
- 2024VisionZip: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Models5 Dec
- 2024PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction22 Oct
- 2024ZipVL: Efficient Large Vision-Language Models with Dynamic Token Sparsification11 Oct
- 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
- 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models11 Mar
Other references · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
- 2023mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodalitycited by 1,038
13 more
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
- 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 536
- 2022Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learningcited by 212
- 2022BlenderBot 3: a deployed conversational agent that continually learns to responsibly engagecited by 197
- 2024Senna: Bridging Large Vision-Language Models and End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 156
- 2023Token Fusion: Bridging the Gap between Token Pruning and Token Mergingcited by 123
- 2022A General Survey on Attention Mechanisms in Deep Learningcited by 64
- 2023Dynamic Token Pruning in Plain Vision Transformers for Semantic Segmentationcited by 61
- 2022Adaptive Sparse ViT: Towards Learnable Adaptive Token Pruning by Fully Exploiting Self-Attentioncited by 35
- 2024Revealing Vision-Language Integration in the Brain with Multimodal Networkscited by 11
- 2024VLTP: Vision-Language Guided Token Pruning for Task-Oriented Segmentationcited by 11
- 2024Video Token Sparsification for Efficient Multimodal LLMs in Autonomous Drivingcited by 11
- 2024B-VLLM: A Vision Large Language Model with Balanced Spatio-Temporal Tokenscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026QMoP: Query Guided Mixture-of-Projector for Efficient Visual Token Compressioncited by 3
- 2026MI-Pruner: Crossmodal Mutual Information-guided Token Pruner for Efficient MLLMscited by 2
- 2026Structural Pruning of Large Vision Language Models: A Comprehensive Study on Pruning Dynamics, Recovery, and Data Efficiencycited by 2
- 2026SinkPruner: Sink-Free Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026SinkPruner: Sink-Free Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models1 Sep 2026
- 2026Structural Pruning of Large Vision Language Models: A Comprehensive Study on Pruning Dynamics, Recovery, and Data Efficiency27 Apr 2026
- 2026MI-Pruner: Crossmodal Mutual Information-guided Token Pruner for Efficient MLLMs3 Apr 2026
- 2026QMoP: Query Guided Mixture-of-Projector for Efficient Visual Token Compression22 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When Text Matters: Design Principles for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Model
- 2026When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics
- 2026Not All Attention Heads Contribute to Critical Visual Token Selection: Head-Aware Pruning Matters More
- 2026LearnPruner: Rethinking Attention-based Token Pruning in Vision Language Models
- 2026AgilePruner: An Empirical Study of Attention and Diversity for Adaptive Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Evading Visual Aphasia: Contrastive Adaptive Semantic Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models
- 2025A Glimpse to Compress: Dynamic Visual Token Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025When Token Pruning is Worse than Random: Understanding Visual Token Information in VLLMs