mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AgilePruner: An Empirical Study of Attention and Diversity for Adaptive Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2603.01236 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have adopted visual token pruning strategies to mitigate substantial computational overhead incurred by extensive visual token sequences. While prior works primarily focus on either attention-based or diversity-based pruning methods, in-depth analysis of these approaches' characteristics and limitations remains largely unexplored. In this work, we conduct thorough empirical analysis using effective rank (erank) as a measure of feature diversity and attention score entropy to investigate visual token processing mechanisms and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Our analysis reveals two insights: (1) Our erank-based quantitative analysis shows that many diversity-oriented pruning methods preserve substantially less feature diversity than intended; moreover, analysis using the CHAIR dataset reveals that the diversity they do retain is closely tied to increased hallucination frequency compared to attention-based pruning. (2) We further observe that attention-based approaches are more effective on simple images where visual evidence is concentrated, while diversity-based methods better handle complex images with distributed features. Building on these empirical insights, we show that incorporating image-aware adjustments into existing hybrid pruning strategies consistently improves their performance. We also provide a minimal instantiation of our empirical findings through a simple adaptive pruning mechanism, which achieves strong and reliable performance across standard benchmarks as well as hallucination-specific evaluations. Our project page available at https://cvsp-lab.github.io/AgilePruner.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 26 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

26 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DivPrune: Diversity-based Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Models4 Mar
  2. 2024VisionZip: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Models5 Dec
  3. 2024Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs2 Dec
  4. 2024ATP-LLaVA: Adaptive Token Pruning for Large Vision Language Models30 Nov
  5. 2024PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction22 Oct
  6. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
  7. 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Models22 Mar
  8. 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models11 Mar

Other references · 18

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  5. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  6. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  8. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  9. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
  10. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  11. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  12. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
6 more
  1. 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,239
  2. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  3. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
  4. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 858
  5. 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 397
  6. 2022Beyond Attentive Tokens: Incorporating Token Importance and Diversity for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 47

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Multi-Image Visual Token Pruning in Large Visual Language Models
  2. 2025GreedyPrune: Retenting Critical Visual Token Set for Large Vision Language Models
  3. 2025Multi-Cue Adaptive Visual Token Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026IWP: Token Pruning as Implicit Weight Pruning in Large Vision Language Models
  5. 2026LearnPruner: Rethinking Attention-based Token Pruning in Vision Language Models
  6. 2025Balanced Token Pruning: Accelerating Vision Language Models Beyond Local Optimization
  7. 2026When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics
  8. 2026Beyond Attention Scores: SVD-Based Vision Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language Models