mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evading Visual Aphasia: Contrastive Adaptive Semantic Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2605.09429 ↗First posted 10 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Are low-attention visual tokens truly redundant in vision-language reasoning? Existing pruning methods often assume so, ranking visual tokens by shallow text-to-image attention and discarding low-scoring patches to accelerate LVLM inference. We show that this scalar criterion is unreliable for compositional reasoning: tokens ignored in early layers can later become essential for resolving secondary objects, spatial relations, and contextual cues. Premature pruning can therefore induce Visual Aphasia, a failure mode in which the model loses visual grounding and falls back on language priors. We introduce COAST (COntrastive Adaptive Semantic Token Pruning), a training-free pruning framework that casts compression as adaptive semantic routing. COAST uses native cross-modal attention to identify query-specific anchors and estimate contextual dispersion via attention entropy, then adapts the retention trade-off between semantic evidence and spatial context. It further uses a contrastive routing score to preserve both anchor-aligned evidence and complementary spatial context. Across seven benchmarks, COAST reduces visual tokens by 77.8% and achieves a 2.15x latency speedup while retaining 98.64% of the original average performance. Beyond a single backbone or compression setting, COAST consistently outperforms strong pruning baselines across token budgets and generalizes across multiple LVLM families, showing that adaptive semantic routing is a robust alternative to one-shot scalar pruning

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 40 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

Builds on

40 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retention3 Oct
  2. 2025Variation-aware Vision Token Dropping for Faster Large Vision-Language Models1 Sep
  3. 2025MMTok: Multimodal Coverage Maximization for Efficient Inference of VLMs25 Aug
  4. 2025Balanced Token Pruning: Accelerating Vision Language Models Beyond Local Optimization28 May
  5. 2025DivPrune: Diversity-based Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Models4 Mar
  6. 2024VisionZip: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Models5 Dec
  7. 2024Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs2 Dec
  8. 2024PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction22 Oct
  9. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
  10. 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Models22 Mar
  11. 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models11 Mar

Other references · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  7. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  8. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  9. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  10. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  11. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  12. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
17 more
  1. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  2. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  3. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
  4. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  5. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
  6. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  7. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 793
  8. 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 784
  9. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  10. 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 671
  11. 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 572
  12. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
  13. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 245
  14. 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
  15. 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 233
  16. 2023Holistic Analysis of Hallucination in GPT-4V(ision): Bias and Interference Challengescited by 131
  17. 2022Visualizing and Understanding Patch Interactions in Vision Transformercited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Not All Attention Heads Contribute to Critical Visual Token Selection: Head-Aware Pruning Matters More
  2. 2026When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics
  3. 2026E2S-Pruner: Progressive Two-Stage Evidence Fusion for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Efficient Vision-Language Reasoning via Adaptive Token Pruning
  5. 2026When Text Matters: Design Principles for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Model
  6. 2026LearnPruner: Rethinking Attention-based Token Pruning in Vision Language Models
  7. 2026SwiftVLM: Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference via Cross-Layer Token Bypass
  8. 2026How Many Visual Tokens Do Multimodal Language Models Need? Scaling Visual Token Pruning with F^3A