Vision Transformers: the threat of realistic adversarial patches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing reliance on machine learning systems has made their security a critical concern. Evasion attacks enable adversaries to manipulate the decision-making processes of AI systems, potentially causing security breaches or misclassification of targets. Vision Transformers (ViTs) have gained significant traction in modern machine learning due to increased 1) performance compared to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and 2) robustness against adversarial perturbations. However, ViTs remain vulnerable to evasion attacks, particularly to adversarial patches, unique patterns designed to manipulate AI classification systems. These vulnerabilities are investigated by designing realistic adversarial patches to cause misclassification in person vs. non-person classification tasks using the Creases Transformation (CT) technique, which adds subtle geometric distortions similar to those occurring naturally when wearing clothing. This study investigates the transferability of adversarial attack techniques used in CNNs when applied to ViT classification models. Experimental evaluation across four fine-tuned ViT models on a binary person classification task reveals significant vulnerability variations: attack success rates ranged from 40.04% (google/vit-base-patch16-224-in21k) to 99.97% (facebook/dino-vitb16), with google/vit-base-patch16-224 achieving 66.40% and facebook/dinov3-vitb16 reaching 65.17%. These results confirm the cross-architectural transferability of adversarial patches from CNNs to ViTs, with pre-training dataset scale and methodology strongly influencing model resilience to adversarial attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
23 of 34 references.
References · 23
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
- 2023AdvCLIP: Downstream-agnostic Adversarial Examples in Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 103
- 2021Towards Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformerscited by 80
- 2023Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformers with Token Gradient Regularizationcited by 42
- 2023DAP: A Dynamic Adversarial Patch for Evading Person Detectorscited by 40
11 more
- 2021Are Vision Transformers Robust to Patch Perturbations?cited by 39
- 2022Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training with Knowledge Graphscited by 34
- 2024Adversarial Attacks of Vision Tasks in the Past 10 Years: A Surveycited by 23
- 2024Transformer for Object Re-Identification: A Surveycited by 22
- 2023Physical Adversarial Attacks for Surveillance: A Surveycited by 15
- 2025Generalized Single-Image-Based Morphing Attack Detection Using Deep Representations from Vision Transformercited by 14
- 2022Backdoor Attacks on Vision Transformerscited by 13
- 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Modelscited by 13
- 2024CLIP-Decoder : ZeroShot Multilabel Classification using Multimodal CLIP Aligned Representationcited by 9
- 2025Mechanistic Understandings of Representation Vulnerabilities and Engineering Robust Vision Transformerscited by 3
- 2023Random Position Adversarial Patch for Vision Transformerscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.