WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There has been growing interest from both practitioners and researchers in engaging end users in AI auditing, to draw upon users' unique knowledge and lived experiences. However, we know little about how to effectively scaffold end users in auditing in ways that can generate actionable insights for AI practitioners. Through formative studies with both users and AI practitioners, we first identified a set of design goals to support user-engaged AI auditing. We then developed WeAudit, a workflow and system that supports end users in auditing AI both individually and collectively. We evaluated WeAudit through a three-week user study with user auditors and interviews with industry Generative AI practitioners. Our findings offer insights into how WeAudit supports users in noticing and reflecting upon potential AI harms and in articulating their findings in ways that industry practitioners can act upon. Based on our observations and feedback from both users and practitioners, we identify several opportunities to better support user engagement in AI auditing processes. We discuss implications for future research to support effective and responsible user engagement in AI auditing and red-teaming.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teamingcited by 8
- 2025What Makes LLM Agent Simulations Useful for Policy Practice? An Iterative Design Study in Emergency Preparednesscited by 2
- 2026PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&Acited by 2
- 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safetycited by 1
- 2026Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictionscited by 1
- 2025A Human-Centered Approach to Identifying Promises, Risks, & Challenges of Text-to-Image Generative AI in Radiologycited by 0
- 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policiescited by 0
- 2026MM-SCALE: Grounded Multimodal Moral Reasoning via Scalar Judgment and Listwise Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AIcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Third-Person Audits: Situated Interaction Auditing for User-Centered LLM Bias Researchcited by 0
- 2026AISPA: User-Centric System Prompt Auditing for Large Language Model Applicationscited by 0
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Levelcited by 0
1 more
- 2026Small-world Networks of Agents Brainstorm AI Risks to Support Ideation21 Sep 2026
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level7 Aug 2026
- 2026AISPA: User-Centric System Prompt Auditing for Large Language Model Applications30 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond Third-Person Audits: Situated Interaction Auditing for User-Centered LLM Bias Research10 Jun 2026
- 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI7 May 2026
- 2026Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictions12 Mar 2026
- 2026PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&A24 Feb 2026
- 2026MM-SCALE: Grounded Multimodal Moral Reasoning via Scalar Judgment and Listwise Alignment3 Feb 2026
- 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety26 Jan 2026
- 2025What Makes LLM Agent Simulations Useful for Policy Practice? An Iterative Design Study in Emergency Preparedness26 Sep 2025
- 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policies24 Sep 2025
- 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teaming3 Sep 2025
- 2026PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&Acited by 2
- 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safetycited by 1
- 2026Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictionscited by 1
- 2025A Human-Centered Approach to Identifying Promises, Risks, & Challenges of Text-to-Image Generative AI in Radiologycited by 0
- 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policiescited by 0
- 2026Beyond Third-Person Audits: Situated Interaction Auditing for User-Centered LLM Bias Researchcited by 0
- 2026AISPA: User-Centric System Prompt Auditing for Large Language Model Applicationscited by 0
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Levelcited by 0
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level7 Aug 2026
- 2026AISPA: User-Centric System Prompt Auditing for Large Language Model Applications30 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond Third-Person Audits: Situated Interaction Auditing for User-Centered LLM Bias Research10 Jun 2026
- 2026Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictions12 Mar 2026
- 2026PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&A24 Feb 2026
- 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety26 Jan 2026
- 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policies24 Sep 2025
- 2025A Human-Centered Approach to Identifying Promises, Risks, & Challenges of Text-to-Image Generative AI in Radiology22 Jul 2025