mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

arXiv 2501.01397 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2025cs.HCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There has been growing interest from both practitioners and researchers in engaging end users in AI auditing, to draw upon users' unique knowledge and lived experiences. However, we know little about how to effectively scaffold end users in auditing in ways that can generate actionable insights for AI practitioners. Through formative studies with both users and AI practitioners, we first identified a set of design goals to support user-engaged AI auditing. We then developed WeAudit, a workflow and system that supports end users in auditing AI both individually and collectively. We evaluated WeAudit through a three-week user study with user auditors and interviews with industry Generative AI practitioners. Our findings offer insights into how WeAudit supports users in noticing and reflecting upon potential AI harms and in articulating their findings in ways that industry practitioners can act upon. Based on our observations and feedback from both users and practitioners, we identify several opportunities to better support user engagement in AI auditing processes. We discuss implications for future research to support effective and responsible user engagement in AI auditing and red-teaming.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: