mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Echoes of Multilinguality: Tracing Cultural Value Shifts during LM Fine-tuning

arXiv 2405.12744 ↗First posted 21 May 2024cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Texts written in different languages reflect different culturally-dependent beliefs of their writers. Thus, we expect multilingual LMs (MLMs), that are jointly trained on a concatenation of text in multiple languages, to encode different cultural values for each language. Yet, as the 'multilinguality' of these LMs is driven by cross-lingual sharing, we also have reason to belief that cultural values bleed over from one language into another. This limits the use of MLMs in practice, as apart from being proficient in generating text in multiple languages, creating language technology that can serve a community also requires the output of LMs to be sensitive to their biases (Naous et al., 2023). Yet, little is known about how cultural values emerge and evolve in MLMs (Hershcovich et al., 2022a). We are the first to study how languages can exert influence on the cultural values encoded for different test languages, by studying how such values are revised during fine-tuning. Focusing on the fine-tuning stage allows us to study the interplay between value shifts when exposed to new linguistic experience from different data sources and languages. Lastly, we use a training data attribution method to find patterns in the fine-tuning examples, and the languages that they come from, that tend to instigate value shifts.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  2. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  4. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
  5. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  6. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
  7. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
  8. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  9. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
  10. 2022Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLPcited by 218
  11. 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 206
  12. 2022Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Valuescited by 149
12 more
  1. 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
  2. 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
  3. 2022Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languagescited by 60
  4. 2023Multilingual Language Models are not Multicultural: A Case Study in Emotioncited by 54
  5. 2023From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values -- A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Modelscited by 45
  6. 2019Blackbox meets blackbox: Representational Similarity and Stability Analysis of Neural Language Models and Brainscited by 38
  7. 2022Speaking Multiple Languages Affects the Moral Bias of Language Modelscited by 34
  8. 2021Stepmothers are mean and academics are pretentious: What do pretrained language models learn about you?cited by 16
  9. 2021Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language Modelscited by 15
  10. 2023Values, Ethics, Morals? On the Use of Moral Concepts in NLP Researchcited by 14
  11. 2023Examining Modularity in Multilingual LMs via Language-Specialized Subnetworkscited by 13
  12. 2020Pair the Dots: Jointly Examining Training History and Test Stimuli for Model Interpretabilitycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 3.

10 papers.