mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ATLASFusion: Aggregation Tracking with Location-Aware Sparse Fusion for Robust Spatio-Temporal Multi-View Pedestrian Tracking

arXiv 2509.08421 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For multimedia spatial intelligence through time, multi-view multi-object tracking (MVMOT) suffers from persistent challenges in maintaining consistent object identities across different camera views, leading to tracking inaccuracies. A key source of these errors in modern methods is the distortion of feature representations when projecting from multiple views into a unified Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) space. This projection often creates non-uniform feature densities, harming the reliability of the fused representation. To address this, we present ATLASFusion, a reliability-aware sparse BEV fusion framework built on three complementary techniques: a sparse perspective transform that projects only valid feature points to prevent interpolation artifacts, density-aware weighted aggregation that assigns higher confidence to spatially reliable regions, and per-view BEV supervision that supervises each camera's BEV features independently before fusion. Experiments on the WildTrack and MultiViewX benchmarks demonstrated improvements in IDF1, MODP, and robustness over the baseline. ATLASFusion achieved a 95.9% IDF1 tracking score on WildTrack, the highest among the compared methods and improved the localization precision (MODP) from 75.0% to 89.2% on MultiViewX. ATLASFusion also exhibited strong robustness under calibration noise. When high-magnitude noise was injected, TrackTacular failed entirely at 0.0% MODA, whereas ATLASFusion retained 40.1% MODA. When the input resolution was reduced by half, MVTr failed entirely and TrackTacular degraded by 2.7% MODA, while ATLASFusion sustained 92.5% MODA with only a 1.1% decrease. These gains were achieved with negligible computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metriccited by 910
  2. 2016Simple Online and Realtime Trackingcited by 868
  3. 2022MUTR3D: A Multi-camera Tracking Framework via 3D-to-2D Queriescited by 91
  4. 2020Multiview Detection with Feature Perspective Transformationcited by 71
  5. 2021Multiview Detection with Shadow Transformer (and View-Coherent Data Augmentation)cited by 45
  6. 2017Deep Occlusion Reasoning for Multi-Camera Multi-Target Detectioncited by 42
  7. 2017Deep Multi-camera People Detectioncited by 37
  8. 2023EarlyBird: Early-Fusion for Multi-View Tracking in the Bird's Eye Viewcited by 33
  9. 2022PolarMOT: How Far Can Geometric Relations Take Us in 3D Multi-Object Tracking?cited by 29
  10. 2024Lifting Multi-View Detection and Tracking to the Bird's Eye Viewcited by 25
  11. 2023ReST: A Reconfigurable Spatial-Temporal Graph Model for Multi-Camera Multi-Object Trackingcited by 24
  12. 2020Real-time 3D Deep Multi-Camera Trackingcited by 23
4 more
  1. 2021Multi-Target Multi-Camera Tracking of Vehicles using Metadata-Aided Re-ID and Trajectory-Based Camera Link Modelcited by 14
  2. 2024MCBLT: Multi-Camera Multi-Object 3D Tracking in Long Videoscited by 9
  3. 2022Booster-SHOT: Boosting Stacked Homography Transformations for Multiview Pedestrian Detection with Attentioncited by 5
  4. 2025MVTrajecter: Multi-View Pedestrian Tracking with Trajectory Motion Cost and Trajectory Appearance Costcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.