mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dual-Thresholded Heatmap-Guided Proposal Clustering and Negative Certainty Supervision with Enhanced Base Network for Weakly Supervised Object Detection

arXiv 2509.08289 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weakly supervised object detection (WSOD) has attracted significant attention in recent years, as it does not require box-level annotations. State-of-the-art methods generally adopt a multi-module network, which employs WSDDN as the multiple instance detection network module and uses multiple instance refinement modules to refine performance. However, these approaches suffer from three key limitations. First, existing methods tend to generate pseudo GT boxes that either focus only on discriminative parts, failing to capture the whole object, or cover the entire object but fail to distinguish between adjacent intra-class instances. Second, the foundational WSDDN architecture lacks a crucial background class representation for each proposal and exhibits a large semantic gap between its branches. Third, prior methods discard ignored proposals during optimization, leading to slow convergence. To address these challenges, we propose the Dual-thresholded heAtmap-guided proposal clustering and Negative Certainty supervision with Enhanced base network (DANCE) method for WSOD. Specifically, we first devise a heatmap-guided proposal selector (HGPS) algorithm, which utilizes dual thresholds on heatmaps to pre-select proposals, enabling pseudo GT boxes to both capture the full object extent and distinguish between adjacent intra-class instances. We then construct a weakly supervised basic detection network (WSBDN), which augments each proposal with a background class representation and uses heatmaps for pre-supervision to bridge the semantic gap between matrices. At last, we introduce a negative certainty supervision (NCS) loss on ignored proposals to accelerate convergence. Extensive experiments on the challenging PASCAL VOC and MS COCO datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our method. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/gyl2565309278/DANCE.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.

Builds on

47 of 80 references.

References · 47

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  7. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  8. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  9. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  10. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  11. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  12. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
35 more
  1. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  2. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  3. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
  4. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  5. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  6. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  7. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,431
  8. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  9. 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 573
  10. 2022DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoisingcited by 488
  11. 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 424
  12. 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
  13. 2019Weakly Supervised Learning of Instance Segmentation with Inter-pixel Relationscited by 247
  14. 2015Weakly Supervised Deep Detection Networkscited by 183
  15. 2017Multiple Instance Detection Network with Online Instance Classifier Refinementcited by 117
  16. 2018PCL: Proposal Cluster Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 97
  17. 2020Instance-aware, Context-focused, and Memory-efficient Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 80
  18. 2022Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation using Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 58
  19. 2019WSOD^2: Learning Bottom-up and Top-down Objectness Distillation for Weakly-supervised Object Detectioncited by 51
  20. 2020Comprehensive Attention Self-Distillation for Weakly-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 50
  21. 2016Weakly Supervised Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 47
  22. 2019Towards Precise End-to-end Weakly Supervised Object Detection Networkcited by 41
  23. 2016ContextLocNet: Context-Aware Deep Network Models for Weakly Supervised Localizationcited by 39
  24. 2020SLV: Spatial Likelihood Voting for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 29
  25. 2019Weakly Supervised Object Detection with Segmentation Collaborationcited by 26
  26. 2018Zigzag Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 24
  27. 2018TS2C: Tight Box Mining with Surrounding Segmentation Context for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 22
  28. 2022Object Discovery via Contrastive Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 16
  29. 2019Object-Aware Instance Labeling for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 11
  30. 2024WeakSAM: Segment Anything Meets Weakly-supervised Instance-level Recognitioncited by 10
  31. 2019Utilizing the Instability in Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 7
  32. 2023DETR with Additional Global Aggregation for Cross-domain Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 5
  33. 2022Absolute Wrong Makes Better: Boosting Weakly Supervised Object Detection via Negative Deterministic Informationcited by 4
  34. 2023Cyclic-Bootstrap Labeling for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 4
  35. 2025Self-Classification Enhancement and Correction for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.