mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SafeToolBench: Pioneering a Prospective Benchmark to Evaluating Tool Utilization Safety in LLMs

arXiv 2509.07315 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.SEcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 20 in LLM agents and tool use, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited great performance in autonomously calling various tools in external environments, leading to better problem solving and task automation capabilities. However, these external tools also amplify potential risks such as financial loss or privacy leakage with ambiguous or malicious user instructions. Compared to previous studies, which mainly assess the safety awareness of LLMs after obtaining the tool execution results (i.e., retrospective evaluation), this paper focuses on prospective ways to assess the safety of LLM tool utilization, aiming to avoid irreversible harm caused by directly executing tools. To this end, we propose SafeToolBench, the first benchmark to comprehensively assess tool utilization security in a prospective manner, covering malicious user instructions and diverse practical toolsets. Additionally, we propose a novel framework, SafeInstructTool, which aims to enhance LLMs' awareness of tool utilization security from three perspectives (i.e., textitUser Instruction, Tool Itself, and Joint Instruction-Tool), leading to nine detailed dimensions in total. We experiment with four LLMs using different methods, revealing that existing approaches fail to capture all risks in tool utilization. In contrast, our framework significantly enhances LLMs' self-awareness, enabling a more safe and trustworthy tool utilization.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 21.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026ATBench: A Diverse and Realistic Agent Trajectory Benchmark for Safety Evaluation and Diagnosiscited by 36
  2. 2026AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?cited by 17
  3. 2025Are Your Agents Upward Deceivers?cited by 16
  4. 2026FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Usecited by 10
  5. 2026Measuring the Permission Gate: A Stress-Test Evaluation of Claude Code's Auto Modecited by 10
  6. 2026AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Securitycited by 8
  7. 2026SABER: Benchmarking Operational Safety of LLM Coding Agents in Stateful Project Workspacescited by 6
  8. 2026LITMUS: Benchmarking Behavioral Jailbreaks of LLM Agents in Real OS Environmentscited by 5
  9. 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agentscited by 4
  10. 2026Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agentscited by 4
  11. 2026Mind the GAP: Text Safety Does Not Transfer to Tool-Call Safety in LLM Agentscited by 3
  12. 2026Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool Invocationscited by 3
10 more
  1. 2026Large Language Models for Agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, Evaluation, and Safetycited by 2
  2. 2026Hallucination as Exploit: Evidence-Carrying Multimodal Agentscited by 2
  3. 2026RUBAS: Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning for Agent Safetycited by 2
  4. 2026Guardrails as Scapegoats: Auditing Unfaithful Safety Refusals in Tool-Augmented LLM Agentscited by 1
  5. 2026Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Modelscited by 1
  6. 2026ForesightSafety-SAGE:A Fully Automated Scenario Generation and Safety Evaluation Framework for LLM Agentscited by 0
  7. 2026AURA-Eval: Evaluation Framework for Acting Under Risk Awareness in LLM Agent Trajectoriescited by 0
  8. 2026JarvisGUI: Towards Cross-Device GUI Agents with Dynamic Task Compositioncited by 0
  9. 2026PASTABench: Proactive Assessment of Sequential Trajectories for Agent Safetycited by 0
  10. 2026PROACT-Agent: Progressive Runtime Oversight and Active Circuit-breaking for Real-Time Safetycited by 0