PIE: Performance Interval Estimation for Free-Form Generation Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Confidence estimation infers a probability for whether each model output is correct or not. While predicting such binary correctness is sensible for tasks with exact answers, free-form generation tasks are often more nuanced, with output quality being both fine-grained and multi-faceted. We thus propose Performance Interval Estimation (PIE) to predict both: 1) point estimates for any arbitrary set of continuous-valued evaluation metrics; and 2) calibrated uncertainty intervals around these point estimates. We then compare two approaches: LLM-as-judge vs. classic regression with confidence estimation features. Evaluation over 11 datasets spans summarization, translation, code generation, function-calling, and question answering. Regression is seen to achieve both: i) lower error point estimates of metric scores; and ii) well-calibrated uncertainty intervals. To support reproduction and follow-on work, we share our data and code.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.
Builds on
47 of 73 references.
References · 47
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
35 more
- 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
- 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 372
- 2020Improving Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation and Zero-Shot Translationcited by 277
- 2022ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answerscited by 234
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
- 2020Reducing conversational agents' overconfidence through linguistic calibrationcited by 210
- 2024APIGen: Automated Pipeline for Generating Verifiable and Diverse Function-Calling Datasetscited by 198
- 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 172
- 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 152
- 2019Asking Clarifying Questions in Open-Domain Information-Seeking Conversationscited by 139
- 2023LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estimation for Language Modelscited by 131
- 2020Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertaintycited by 129
- 2025NoLiMa: Long-Context Evaluation Beyond Literal Matchingcited by 126
- 2024Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Modelscited by 121
- 2024What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Knowcited by 110
- 2023Fly-Swat or Cannon? Cost-Effective Language Model Choice via Meta-Modelingcited by 95
- 2024The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Modelscited by 93
- 2024Learning to Route LLMs with Confidence Tokenscited by 67
- 2024From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable Regressor When Given In-Context Examplescited by 57
- 2023Adaptation with Self-Evaluation to Improve Selective Prediction in LLMscited by 50
- 2021Uncertainty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 35
- 2024A Benchmark for Long-Form Medical Question Answeringcited by 25
- 2023A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertaintycited by 23
- 2023OrchestraLLM: Efficient Orchestration of Language Models for Dialogue State Trackingcited by 19
- 2016There's No Comparison: Reference-less Evaluation Metrics in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 18
- 2025Human-Written vs. AI-Generated Code: A Large-Scale Study of Defects, Vulnerabilities, and Complexitycited by 16
- 2025Quantile Regression with Large Language Models for Price Predictioncited by 10
- 2023Evaluating Machine Translation Quality with Conformal Predictive Distributionscited by 9
- 2024Is Reference Necessary in the Evaluation of NLG Systems? When and Where?cited by 6
- 2019Automatic Quality Estimation for Natural Language Generation: Ranting (Jointly Rating and Ranking)cited by 4
- 2025Rethinking Autonomy: Preventing Failures in AI-Driven Software Engineeringcited by 4
- 2025An Empirical Study of Evaluating Long-form Question Answeringcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.