mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Arbitration Control for an Ensemble of Diversified DQN variants in Continual Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2509.04815 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) models, despite their efficiency in learning an optimal policy in static environments, easily loses previously learned knowledge (i.e., catastrophic forgetting). It leads RL models to poor performance in continual reinforcement learning (CRL) scenarios. To address this, we present an arbitration control mechanism over an ensemble of RL agents. It is motivated by and closely aligned with how humans make decisions in a CRL context using an arbitration control of multiple RL agents in parallel as observed in the prefrontal cortex. We integrated two key ideas into our model: (1) an ensemble of RLs (i.e., DQN variants) explicitly trained to have diverse value functions and (2) an arbitration control that prioritizes agents with higher reliability (i.e., less error) in recent trials. We propose a framework for CRL, an Arbitration Control for an Ensemble of Diversified DQN variants (ACED-DQN). We demonstrate significant performance improvements in both static and continual environments, supported by empirical evidence showing the effectiveness of arbitration control over diversified DQNs during training. In this work, we introduced a framework that enables RL agents to continuously learn, with inspiration from the human brain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.

Builds on

18 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024The Curse of Diversity in Ensemble-Based Exploration7 May

Other references · 17

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  3. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
  4. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
  5. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
  6. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
  7. 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 274
  8. 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 266
  9. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
  10. 2021Mastering Atari Games with Limited Datacited by 237
  11. 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  12. 2023A Definition of Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 101
5 more
  1. 2024Continual Learning and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 77
  2. 2021Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximationcited by 49
  3. 2019Off-Policy Actor-Critic with Shared Experience Replaycited by 39
  4. 2021Ensemble Bootstrapping for Q-Learningcited by 31
  5. 2021Continuous Control With Ensemble Deep Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Survey of Continual Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Principled Fast and Meta Knowledge Learners for Continual Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Don't Forget the Critic: Value-Based Data Rehearsal for Multi-Cyclic Continual Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026RL Forgets! Towards Continual Policy Optimization
  5. 2024Hierarchical Orchestra of Policies
  6. 2026Beyond Isolation: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning Component Synergy for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control
  7. 2026Beyond Single-Model Optimization: Preserving Plasticity in Continual Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025Self-Composing Policies for Scalable Continual Reinforcement Learning