Psychologically Enhanced AI Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce MBTI-in-Thoughts, a framework for enhancing the effectiveness of Large Language Model (LLM) agents through psychologically grounded personality conditioning. Drawing on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), our method primes agents with distinct personality archetypes via prompt engineering, enabling control over behavior along two foundational axes of human psychology, cognition and affect. We show that such personality priming yields consistent, interpretable behavioral biases across diverse tasks: emotionally expressive agents excel in narrative generation, while analytically primed agents adopt more stable strategies in game-theoretic settings. Our framework supports experimenting with structured multi-agent communication protocols and reveals that self-reflection prior to interaction improves cooperation and reasoning quality. To ensure trait persistence, we integrate the official 16Personalities test for automated verification. While our focus is on MBTI, we show that our approach generalizes seamlessly to other psychological frameworks such as Big Five, HEXACO, or Enneagram. By bridging psychological theory and LLM behavior design, we establish a foundation for psychologically enhanced AI agents without any fine-tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.
Builds on
30 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 29
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 290
- 2023Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMscited by 215
- 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language modelscited by 155
- 2023Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimulicited by 146
- 2023Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfacescited by 72
17 more
- 2023Suspicion-Agent: Playing Imperfect Information Games with Theory of Mind Aware GPT-4cited by 68
- 2023CharacterChat: Learning towards Conversational AI with Personalized Social Supportcited by 60
- 2023Strategic Behavior of Large Language Models: Game Structure vs. Contextual Framingcited by 51
- 2023Exploring the psychology of LLMs' Moral and Legal Reasoningcited by 44
- 2023Self-Assessment Tests are Unreliable Measures of LLM Personalitycited by 39
- 2023ChaCha: Leveraging Large Language Models to Prompt Children to Share Their Emotions about Personal Eventscited by 31
- 2023Systematic Evaluation of GPT-3 for Zero-Shot Personality Estimationcited by 29
- 2023Learning Personalized Alignment for Evaluating Open-ended Text Generationcited by 29
- 2023Denevil: Towards Deciphering and Navigating the Ethical Values of Large Language Models via Instruction Learningcited by 26
- 2024PsycoLLM: Enhancing LLM for Psychological Understanding and Evaluationcited by 26
- 2023Editing Personality for Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2024Multi-Head RAG: Solving Multi-Aspect Problems with LLMscited by 18
- 2023AI Text-to-Behavior: A Study In Steerabilitycited by 11
- 2025Bullying the Machine: How Personas Increase LLM Vulnerabilitycited by 9
- 2023The Cultural Psychology of Large Language Models: Is ChatGPT a Holistic or Analytic Thinker?cited by 8
- 2025Affordable AI Assistants with Knowledge Graph of Thoughtscited by 6
- 2023ValueDCG: Measuring Comprehensive Human Value Understanding Ability of Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models
- 2026Structured Personality Control and Adaptation for LLM Agents
- 2025Deterministic AI Agent Personality Expression through Standard Psychological Diagnostics
- 2025The Power of Personality: A Human Simulation Perspective to Investigate Large Language Model Agents
- 2024Designing AI-Agents with Personalities: A Psychometric Approach
- 2023Machine Psychology
- 2026Behavior-Adaptive Conversational Agents: Toward a Fluid Personality Framework
- 2024AFSPP: Agent Framework for Shaping Preference and Personality with Large Language Models