mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Cultural Psychology of Large Language Models: Is ChatGPT a Holistic or Analytic Thinker?

arXiv 2308.14242 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2023cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

The prevalent use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has necessitated studying their mental models, yielding noteworthy theoretical and practical implications. Current research has demonstrated that state-of-the-art LLMs, such as ChatGPT, exhibit certain theory of mind capabilities and possess relatively stable Big Five and/or MBTI personality traits. In addition, cognitive process features form an essential component of these mental models. Research in cultural psychology indicated significant differences in the cognitive processes of Eastern and Western people when processing information and making judgments. While Westerners predominantly exhibit analytical thinking that isolates things from their environment to analyze their nature independently, Easterners often showcase holistic thinking, emphasizing relationships and adopting a global viewpoint. In our research, we probed the cultural cognitive traits of ChatGPT. We employed two scales that directly measure the cognitive process: the Analysis-Holism Scale (AHS) and the Triadic Categorization Task (TCT). Additionally, we used two scales that investigate the value differences shaped by cultural thinking: the Dialectical Self Scale (DSS) and the Self-construal Scale (SCS). In cognitive process tests (AHS/TCT), ChatGPT consistently tends towards Eastern holistic thinking, but regarding value judgments (DSS/SCS), ChatGPT does not significantly lean towards the East or the West. We suggest that the result could be attributed to both the training paradigm and the training data in LLM development. We discuss the potential value of this finding for AI research and directions for future research.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 2 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.

Builds on

2 of 18 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Frameworkcited by 70
  2. 2023Does ChatGPT have Theory of Mind?cited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models on Human Expression and Thought
  2. 2023Large Language Models as Superpositions of Cultural Perspectives
  3. 2023Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions
  4. 2025Contrasting Cognitive Styles in Vision-Language Models: Holistic Attention in Japanese Versus Analytical Focus in English
  5. 2025Can LLMs Express Personality Across Cultures? Introducing CulturalPersonas for Evaluating Trait Alignment
  6. 2025From Five Dimensions to Many: Large Language Models as Precise and Interpretable Psychological Profilers
  7. 2025XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models
  8. 2024Multi-ToM: Evaluating Multilingual Theory of Mind Capabilities in Large Language Models