Align-then-Slide: A complete evaluation framework for Ultra-Long Document-Level Machine Translation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have ushered in a new era for document-level machine translation (textitdoc-mt), yet their whole-document outputs challenge existing evaluation methods that assume sentence-by-sentence alignment. We introduce textitAlign-then-Slide, a complete evaluation framework for ultra-long doc-mt. In the Align stage, we automatically infer sentence-level source-target correspondences and rebuild the target to match the source sentence number, resolving omissions and many-to-one/one-to-many mappings. In the n-Chunk Sliding Evaluate stage, we calculate averaged metric scores under 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-chunk for multi-granularity assessment. Experiments on the WMT benchmark show a Pearson correlation of 0.929 between our method with expert MQM rankings. On a newly curated real-world test set, our method again aligns closely with human judgments. Furthermore, preference data produced by Align-then-Slide enables effective CPO training and its direct use as a reward model for GRPO, both yielding translations preferred over a vanilla SFT baseline. The results validate our framework as an accurate, robust, and actionable evaluation tool for doc-mt systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.
Builds on
12 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
- 2020Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 56
- 2022Embarrassingly Easy Document-Level MT Metrics: How to Convert Any Pretrained Metric Into a Document-Level Metriccited by 56
- 2021Measuring and Increasing Context Usage in Context-Aware Machine Translationcited by 48
- 2019When and Why is Document-level Context Useful in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 45
- 2023SLIDE: Reference-free Evaluation for Machine Translation using a Sliding Document Windowcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Document-level Translation: Overview, Challenges and Trends
- 2023Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey
- 2025Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation
- 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translation
- 2023Text Alignment Is An Efficient Unified Model for Massive NLP Tasks
- 2024Is Preference Alignment Always the Best Option to Enhance LLM-Based Translation? An Empirical Analysis
- 2024Paraphrase-Aligned Machine Translation
- 2024Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluators