mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Align-then-Slide: A complete evaluation framework for Ultra-Long Document-Level Machine Translation

arXiv 2509.03809 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have ushered in a new era for document-level machine translation (textitdoc-mt), yet their whole-document outputs challenge existing evaluation methods that assume sentence-by-sentence alignment. We introduce textitAlign-then-Slide, a complete evaluation framework for ultra-long doc-mt. In the Align stage, we automatically infer sentence-level source-target correspondences and rebuild the target to match the source sentence number, resolving omissions and many-to-one/one-to-many mappings. In the n-Chunk Sliding Evaluate stage, we calculate averaged metric scores under 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-chunk for multi-granularity assessment. Experiments on the WMT benchmark show a Pearson correlation of 0.929 between our method with expert MQM rankings. On a newly curated real-world test set, our method again aligns closely with human judgments. Furthermore, preference data produced by Align-then-Slide enables effective CPO training and its direct use as a reward model for GRPO, both yielding translations preferred over a vanilla SFT baseline. The results validate our framework as an accurate, robust, and actionable evaluation tool for doc-mt systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

Builds on

12 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan

Other references · 11

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  4. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  5. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  6. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  7. 2020Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 56
  8. 2022Embarrassingly Easy Document-Level MT Metrics: How to Convert Any Pretrained Metric Into a Document-Level Metriccited by 56
  9. 2021Measuring and Increasing Context Usage in Context-Aware Machine Translationcited by 48
  10. 2019When and Why is Document-level Context Useful in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 45
  11. 2023SLIDE: Reference-free Evaluation for Machine Translation using a Sliding Document Windowcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Document-level Translation: Overview, Challenges and Trends
  2. 2023Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey
  3. 2025Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation
  4. 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translation
  5. 2023Text Alignment Is An Efficient Unified Model for Massive NLP Tasks
  6. 2024Is Preference Alignment Always the Best Option to Enhance LLM-Based Translation? An Empirical Analysis
  7. 2024Paraphrase-Aligned Machine Translation
  8. 2024Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluators