mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SiLVERScore: Semantically-Aware Embeddings for Sign Language Generation Evaluation

arXiv 2509.03791 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating sign language generation is often done through back-translation, where generated signs are first recognized back to text and then compared to a reference using text-based metrics. However, this two-step evaluation pipeline introduces ambiguity: it not only fails to capture the multimodal nature of sign language-such as facial expressions, spatial grammar, and prosody-but also makes it hard to pinpoint whether evaluation errors come from sign generation model or the translation system used to assess it. In this work, we propose SiLVERScore, a novel semantically-aware embedding-based evaluation metric that assesses sign language generation in a joint embedding space. Our contributions include: (1) identifying limitations of existing metrics, (2) introducing SiLVERScore for semantically-aware evaluation, (3) demonstrating its robustness to semantic and prosodic variations, and (4) exploring generalization challenges across datasets. On PHOENIX-14T and CSL-Daily datasets, SiLVERScore achieves near-perfect discrimination between correct and random pairs (ROC AUC = 0.99, overlap < 7%), substantially outperforming traditional metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2020Speech Gesture Generation from the Trimodal Context of Text, Audio, and Speaker Identitycited by 202
  6. 2021Improving Sign Language Translation with Monolingual Data by Sign Back-Translationcited by 179
  7. 2020Progressive Transformers for End-to-End Sign Language Productioncited by 120
  8. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  9. 2019Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectivecited by 87
  10. 2021Including Signed Languages in Natural Language Processingcited by 68
  11. 2021Continuous 3D Multi-Channel Sign Language Production via Progressive Transformers and Mixture Density Networkscited by 50
  12. 2021Read and Attend: Temporal Localisation in Sign Language Videoscited by 34
9 more
  1. 2024Improving Gloss-free Sign Language Translation by Reducing Representation Densitycited by 31
  2. 2024SignCLIP: Connecting Text and Sign Language by Contrastive Learningcited by 20
  3. 2024SignAvatar: Sign Language 3D Motion Reconstruction and Generationcited by 14
  4. 2023Sign Language Production with Latent Motion Transformercited by 13
  5. 2022Including Facial Expressions in Contextual Embeddings for Sign Language Generationcited by 12
  6. 2022Modeling Intensification for Sign Language Generation: A Computational Approachcited by 9
  7. 2024Multi-Stream Keypoint Attention Network for Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 9
  8. 2023A Survey on Deep Multi-modal Learning for Body Language Recognition and Generationcited by 3
  9. 2024signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWritingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.