mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Error Notebook-Guided, Training-Free Part Retrieval in 3D CAD Assemblies via Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2509.01350 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Chart understanding and anomaly detection

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective specification-aware part retrieval within complex CAD assemblies is essential for automated engineering tasks. However, using LLMs/VLMs for this task is challenging: the CAD model metadata sequences often exceed token budgets, and fine-tuning high-performing proprietary models (e.g., GPT or Gemini) is unavailable. Therefore, we need a framework that delivers engineering value by handling long, non-natural-language CAD model metadata using VLMs, but without training. We propose a 2-stage framework with inference-time adaptation that combines corrected Error Notebooks with RAG to substantially improve VLM-based part retrieval reasoning. Each Error Notebook is built by correcting initial CoTs through reflective refinement, and then filtering each trajectory using our proposed grammar-constraint (GC) verifier to ensure structural well-formedness. The resulting notebook forms a high-quality repository of specification-CoT-answer triplets, from which RAG retrieves specification-relevant exemplars to condition the model's inference. We additionally contribute a CAD dataset with human preference annotations. Experiments with proprietary models (GPT-4o, Gemini, etc) show large gains, with GPT-4o (Omni) achieving up to +23.4 absolute accuracy points on the human-preference benchmark. The proposed GC verifier can further produce up to +4.5 accuracy points. Our approach also surpasses other training-free baselines (standard few-shot learning, self-consistency) and yields substantial improvements also for open-source VLMs (Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct, Aya-Vision-8B). Under the cross-model GC setting, where the Error Notebook is constructed using GPT-4o (Omni), the 2B model inference achieves performance that comes within roughly 4 points of GPT-4o mini.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 20 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 22 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  2. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 307
  4. 2021DeepCAD: A Deep Generative Network for Computer-Aided Design Modelscited by 271
  5. 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 170
  6. 2023Learning From Mistakes Makes LLM Better Reasonercited by 101
  7. 2021BRepNet: A topological message passing system for solid modelscited by 95
  8. 2024Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct Reasoningcited by 86
  9. 2021JoinABLe: Learning Bottom-up Assembly of Parametric CAD Jointscited by 78
  10. 2024Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoningcited by 69
  11. 2025CAD-Llama: Leveraging Large Language Models for Computer-Aided Design Parametric 3D Model Generationcited by 67
  12. 2024Generating CAD Code with Vision-Language Models for 3D Designscited by 62
8 more
  1. 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervisioncited by 60
  2. 2024Confidence v.s. Critique: A Decomposition of Self-Correction Capability for LLMscited by 29
  3. 2023Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 26
  4. 2024Small Language Model Can Self-correctcited by 23
  5. 2025LEMMA: Learning from Errors for MatheMatical Advancement in LLMscited by 21
  6. 2025Large Language Models for Computer-Aided Design: A Surveycited by 18
  7. 2024S^3cMath: Spontaneous Step-level Self-correction Makes Large Language Models Better Mathematical Reasonerscited by 17
  8. 2025Generative AI for CAD Automation: Leveraging Large Language Models for 3D Modellingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026STEP-LLM: Generating CAD STEP Models from Natural Language with Large Language Models
  2. 2026BenchCAD: A Comprehensive, Industry-Standard Benchmark for Programmatic CAD
  3. 2026MUSE: Benchmarking Manufacturable, Functional, and Assemblable Text-to-CAD Generation
  4. 2026Foundation Models for Automatic CAD Generation
  5. 2026OmniMech: All-in-one Multimodal Mechanical Benchmark for 3D Reconstruction
  6. 2025Seek-CAD: A Self-refined Generative Modeling for 3D Parametric CAD Using Local Inference via DeepSeek
  7. 2025CAD-Coder: An Open-Source Vision-Language Model for Computer-Aided Design Code Generation
  8. 2026Text-to-CAD Retrieval: a Strong Baseline