mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained

arXiv 2407.18454 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite these advancements, LMs can inherit and amplify societal biases related to sensitive attributes such as gender and race, limiting their adoption in real-world applications. Therefore, fairness has been extensively explored in LMs, leading to the proposal of various fairness notions. However, the lack of clear agreement on which fairness definition to apply in specific contexts and the complexity of understanding the distinctions between these definitions can create confusion and impede further progress. To this end, this paper proposes a systematic survey that clarifies the definitions of fairness as they apply to LMs. Specifically, we begin with a brief introduction to LMs and fairness in LMs, followed by a comprehensive, up-to-date overview of existing fairness notions in LMs and the introduction of a novel taxonomy that categorizes these concepts based on their transformer architecture: encoder-only, decoder-only, and encoder-decoder LMs. We further illustrate each definition through experiments, showcasing their practical implications and outcomes. Finally, we discuss current research challenges and open questions, aiming to foster innovative ideas and advance the field. The repository is publicly available online at https://github.com/vanbanTruong/Fairness-in-Large-Language-Models/tree/main/definitions.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 121 of its 199 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.

Builds on

121 of 199 references.

References · 121

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  6. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  7. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  8. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  9. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  10. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  11. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  12. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
38 more
  1. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  6. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  7. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  8. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  9. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  10. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
  11. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  12. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  13. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  14. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  15. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  16. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  17. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  18. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
  19. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
  20. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  21. 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 642
  22. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 632
  23. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
  24. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 557
  25. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  26. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  27. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
  28. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  29. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  30. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
  31. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  32. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  33. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  34. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  35. 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
  36. 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 262
  37. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  38. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 244

50 most cited of 121 All 121 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

10 papers.