mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Transparent AI: A Survey on Explainable Language Models

arXiv 2509.21631 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language Models (LMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing and enabled remarkable progress across diverse domains, yet their black-box nature raises critical concerns about the interpretability of their internal mechanisms and decision-making processes. This lack of transparency is particularly problematic for adoption in high-stakes domains, where stakeholders need to understand the rationale behind model outputs to ensure accountability. On the other hand, while explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have been well studied for non-LMs, they face many limitations when applied to LMs due to their complex architectures, considerable training corpora, and broad generalization abilities. Although various surveys have examined XAI in the context of LMs, they often fail to capture the distinct challenges arising from the architectural diversity and evolving capabilities of these models. To bridge this gap, this survey presents a comprehensive review of XAI techniques with a particular emphasis on LMs, organizing them according to their underlying transformer architectures: encoder-only, decoder-only, and encoder-decoder, and analyzing how methods are adapted to each while assessing their respective strengths and limitations. Furthermore, we evaluate these techniques through the dual lenses of plausibility and faithfulness, offering a structured perspective on their effectiveness. Finally, we identify open research challenges and outline promising future directions, aiming to guide ongoing efforts toward the development of robust, transparent, and interpretable XAI methods for LMs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 98 of its 155 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

98 of 155 references.

References · 98

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  7. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  8. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  9. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  10. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  11. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  12. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
38 more
  1. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  3. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  6. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
  7. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  8. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  9. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  10. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  11. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  12. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
  13. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  14. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
  15. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
  16. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  17. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  18. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
  19. 2023Larger language models do in-context learning differentlycited by 394
  20. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  21. 2023CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 333
  22. 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
  23. 2022Data Distributional Properties Drive Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformerscited by 309
  24. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
  25. 2019A Multiscale Visualization of Attention in the Transformer Modelcited by 292
  26. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
  27. 2023Large Language Models in Finance: A Surveycited by 226
  28. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 180
  29. 2018Higher-order Coreference Resolution with Coarse-to-fine Inferencecited by 150
  30. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
  31. 2019On Identifiability in Transformerscited by 116
  32. 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
  33. 2022Automating Code Review Activities by Large-Scale Pre-trainingcited by 98
  34. 2023Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language Explanationscited by 85
  35. 2021Low-Complexity Probing via Finding Subnetworkscited by 64
  36. 2019FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifiercited by 63
  37. 2024Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 58
  38. 2018Evaluating Layers of Representation in Neural Machine Translation on Part-of-Speech and Semantic Tagging Taskscited by 56

50 most cited of 98 All 98 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.