mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Preventing Discriminatory Decision-making in Evolving Data Streams

arXiv 2302.08017 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bias in machine learning has rightly received significant attention over the last decade. However, most fair machine learning (fair-ML) work to address bias in decision-making systems has focused solely on the offline setting. Despite the wide prevalence of online systems in the real world, work on identifying and correcting bias in the online setting is severely lacking. The unique challenges of the online environment make addressing bias more difficult than in the offline setting. First, Streaming Machine Learning (SML) algorithms must deal with the constantly evolving real-time data stream. Second, they need to adapt to changing data distributions (concept drift) to make accurate predictions on new incoming data. Adding fairness constraints to this already complicated task is not straightforward. In this work, we focus on the challenges of achieving fairness in biased data streams while accounting for the presence of concept drift, accessing one sample at a time. We present Fair Sampling over Stream (FS2), a novel fair rebalancing approach capable of being integrated with SML classification algorithms. Furthermore, we devise the first unified performance-fairness metric, Fairness Bonded Utility (FBU), to evaluate and compare the trade-off between performance and fairness of different bias mitigation methods efficiently. FBU simplifies the comparison of fairness-performance trade-offs of multiple techniques through one unified and intuitive evaluation, allowing model designers to easily choose a technique. Overall, extensive evaluations show our measures surpass those of other fair online techniques previously reported in the literature.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.

Builds on

19 of 63 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  3. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  4. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  5. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 92
  6. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  7. 2019FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifiercited by 63
  8. 2017Oversampling for Imbalanced Learning Based on K-Means and SMOTEcited by 38
  9. 2021FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifiercited by 37
  10. 2019Automatic Testing and Improvement of Machine Translationcited by 35
  11. 2020Metric-Free Individual Fairness in Online Learningcited by 30
  12. 2022Longitudinal Fairness with Censorshipcited by 21
7 more
  1. 2015A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learningcited by 15
  2. 2019Fairness-enhancing interventions in stream classificationcited by 15
  3. 2020Visual Analysis of Discrimination in Machine Learningcited by 15
  4. 2020Using Machine Learning to Automate Mammogram Images Analysiscited by 15
  5. 2023Fair Decision-making Under Uncertaintycited by 15
  6. 2013Online Ensemble Learning for Imbalanced Data Streamscited by 12
  7. 2021Online Fairness-Aware Learning with Imbalanced Data Streamscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

12 papers.