mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distribution-Aware Feature Selection for SAEs

arXiv 2508.21324 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose neural activations into interpretable features. A widely adopted variant, the TopK SAE, reconstructs each token from its K most active latents. However, this approach is inefficient, as some tokens carry more information than others. BatchTopK addresses this limitation by selecting top activations across a batch of tokens. This improves average reconstruction but risks an "activation lottery," where rare high-magnitude features crowd out more informative but lower-magnitude ones. To address this issue, we introduce Sampled-SAE: we score the columns (representing features) of the batch activation matrix (via L2 norm or entropy), forming a candidate pool of size Kl, and then apply Top-K to select tokens across the batch from the restricted pool of features. Varying l traces a spectrum between batch-level and token-specific selection. At l=1, tokens draw only from K globally influential features, while larger l expands the pool toward standard BatchTopK and more token-specific features across the batch. Small l thus enforces global consistency; large l favors fine-grained reconstruction. On Pythia-160M, no single value optimizes l across all metrics: the best choice depends on the trade-off between shared structure, reconstruction fidelity, and downstream performance. Sampled-SAE thus reframes BatchTopK as a tunable, distribution-aware family.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  2. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  4. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
  5. 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 288
  6. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
  7. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
  8. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
  9. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 113
  10. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 93
  11. 2015Input Sparsity Time Low-Rank Approximation via Ridge Leverage Score Samplingcited by 46
  12. 2015Frequent Directions : Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketchingcited by 39
5 more
  1. 2025Interpretability in Parameter Space: Minimizing Mechanistic Description Length with Attribution-based Parameter Decompositioncited by 27
  2. 2016Online Row Samplingcited by 15
  3. 2014ℓp Row Sampling by Lewis Weightscited by 8
  4. 2023Interpreting Learned Feedback Patterns in Large Language Modelscited by 4
  5. 2015Online Matrix Completion and Online Robust PCAcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2024Adaptive Sparse Allocation with Mutual Choice & Feature Choice Sparse Autoencoders
  3. 2026SoftSAE: Dynamic Top-K Selection for Adaptive Sparse Autoencoders
  4. 2026Beyond the Hard Budget: Sparsity Regularizers for More Interpretable Top-k Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?
  6. 2026Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility
  7. 2026Active Budget Can Kill Sensitivity: Diagnosing and Repairing TopK Sparse Autoencoder Reliability
  8. 2026Improving Sparse Autoencoder with Dynamic Attention