mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SoftSAE: Dynamic Top-K Selection for Adaptive Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2605.06610 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have become an important tool in mechanistic interpretability, helping to analyze internal representations in both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs). By decomposing polysemantic activations into sparse sets of monosemantic features, SAEs aim to translate neural network computations into human-understandable concepts. However, common architectures such as TopK SAEs rely on a fixed sparsity level. They enforce the same number of active features (K) across all inputs, ignoring the varying complexity of real-world data. Natural data often lies on manifolds with varying local intrinsic dimensionality, meaning the number of relevant factors can change significantly across samples. This suggests that a fixed sparsity level is not optimal. Simple inputs may require only a few features, while more complex ones need more expressive representations. Using a constant K can therefore introduce noise in simple cases or miss important structure in more complex ones. To address this issue, we propose SoftSAE, a sparse autoencoder with a Dynamic Top-K selection mechanism. Our method uses a differentiable Soft Top-K operator to learn an input-dependent sparsity level k. This allows the model to adjust the number of active features based on the complexity of each input. As a result, the representation better matches the structure of the data, and the explanation length reflects the amount of information in the input. Experimental results confirm that SoftSAE not only finds meaningful features, but also selects the right number of features for each concept. The source code is available at: https://github.com/St0pien/SoftSAE.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders21 Mar

Other references · 20

  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  2. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  3. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  5. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
  6. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  7. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  8. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
  9. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 137
  10. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
  11. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
  12. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 119
8 more
  1. 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 80
  2. 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 60
  3. 2024One-Step is Enough: Sparse Autoencoders for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 33
  4. 2023Labeling Neural Representations with Inverse Recognitioncited by 32
  5. 2022LIDL: Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Approximate Likelihoodcited by 30
  6. 2024An X-Ray Is Worth 15 Features: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Radiology Report Generationcited by 25
  7. 2024Beyond Interpretability: The Gains of Feature Monosemanticity on Model Robustnesscited by 13
  8. 2025LapSum -- One Method to Differentiate Them All: Ranking, Sorting and Top-k Selectioncited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Active Budget Can Kill Sensitivity: Diagnosing and Repairing TopK Sparse Autoencoder Reliability
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?
  3. 2025TopK Language Models
  4. 2026Improving Sparse Autoencoder with Dynamic Attention
  5. 2025Distribution-Aware Feature Selection for SAEs
  6. 2025SplInterp: Improving our Understanding and Training of Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2025Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders: Select-and-Project for Fairness and Control from Encoder Features Alone
  8. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features