mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Sparse Allocation with Mutual Choice & Feature Choice Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2411.02124 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising approach to extracting features from neural networks, enabling model interpretability as well as causal interventions on model internals. SAEs generate sparse feature representations using a sparsifying activation function that implicitly defines a set of token-feature matches. We frame the token-feature matching as a resource allocation problem constrained by a total sparsity upper bound. For example, TopK SAEs solve this allocation problem with the additional constraint that each token matches with at most k features. In TopK SAEs, the k active features per token constraint is the same across tokens, despite some tokens being more difficult to reconstruct than others. To address this limitation, we propose two novel SAE variants, Feature Choice SAEs and Mutual Choice SAEs, which each allow for a variable number of active features per token. Feature Choice SAEs solve the sparsity allocation problem under the additional constraint that each feature matches with at most m tokens. Mutual Choice SAEs solve the unrestricted allocation problem where the total sparsity budget can be allocated freely between tokens and features. Additionally, we introduce a new auxiliary loss function, mathttauxzipfloss, which generalises the mathttauxkloss to mitigate dead and underutilised features. Our methods result in SAEs with fewer dead features and improved reconstruction loss at equivalent sparsity levels as a result of the inherent adaptive computation. More accurate and scalable feature extraction methods provide a path towards better understanding and more precise control of foundation models.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

15 of 34 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  2. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  3. 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 611
  4. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  5. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
  6. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  7. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  8. 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 77
  9. 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Modelscited by 51
  10. 2014Sparse Modeling for Image and Vision Processingcited by 48
  11. 2023Adaptive Computation with Elastic Input Sequencecited by 22
  12. 2024Routers in Vision Mixture of Experts: An Empirical Studycited by 22
3 more
  1. 2024Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEscited by 22
  2. 2024Rethinking Conventional Wisdom in Machine Learning: From Generalization to Scalingcited by 21
  3. 2019JumpReLU: A Retrofit Defense Strategy for Adversarial Attackscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

9 papers.