Adaptive Dual Uncertainty Optimization: Boosting Monocular 3D Object Detection under Test-Time Shifts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate monocular 3D object detection (M3OD) is pivotal for safety-critical applications like autonomous driving, yet its reliability deteriorates significantly under real-world domain shifts caused by environmental or sensor variations. To address these shifts, Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods have emerged, enabling models to adapt to target distributions during inference. While prior TTA approaches recognize the positive correlation between low uncertainty and high generalization ability, they fail to address the dual uncertainty inherent to M3OD: semantic uncertainty (ambiguous class predictions) and geometric uncertainty (unstable spatial localization). To bridge this gap, we propose Dual Uncertainty Optimization (DUO), the first TTA framework designed to jointly minimize both uncertainties for robust M3OD. Through a convex optimization lens, we introduce an innovative convex structure of the focal loss and further derive a novel unsupervised version, enabling label-agnostic uncertainty weighting and balanced learning for high-uncertainty objects. In parallel, we design a semantic-aware normal field constraint that preserves geometric coherence in regions with clear semantic cues, reducing uncertainty from the unstable 3D representation. This dual-branch mechanism forms a complementary loop: enhanced spatial perception improves semantic classification, and robust semantic predictions further refine spatial understanding. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of DUO over existing methods across various datasets and domain shift types.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.
Builds on
41 of 55 references.
References · 41
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2017Deep Layer Aggregationcited by 436
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
- 2021Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 327
- 2021Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspectivecited by 191
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
- 2021Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 185
29 more
- 2020On the uncertainty of self-supervised monocular depth estimationcited by 182
- 2019Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 169
- 2021Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 156
- 2020MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationshipscited by 153
- 2020Train in Germany, Test in The USA: Making 3D Object Detectors Generalizecited by 151
- 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 141
- 2021Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 140
- 2022Vision-Centric BEV Perception: A Surveycited by 126
- 2022MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformercited by 109
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2021AutoShape: Real-Time Shape-Aware Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 87
- 2021Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 20223D Object Detection from Images for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 66
- 2023LATR: 3D Lane Detection from Monocular Images with Transformercited by 44
- 2024MonoCD: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Complementary Depthscited by 39
- 2022MonoGround: Detecting Monocular 3D Objects from the Groundcited by 37
- 2022Video Test-Time Adaptation for Action Recognitioncited by 35
- 2023MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 33
- 2021Power-law escape rate of SGDcited by 29
- 2024Depth-aware Test-Time Training for Zero-shot Video Object Segmentationcited by 27
- 2022Gradient-based Uncertainty for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 26
- 2023Fast-Slow Test-Time Adaptation for Online Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 25
- 2023ClusT3: Information Invariant Test-Time Trainingcited by 21
- 2024Backpropagation-free Network for 3D Test-time Adaptationcited by 14
- 2025Beyond Entropy: Region Confidence Proxy for Wild Test-Time Adaptationcited by 11
- 2020Foreground-Background Imbalance Problem in Deep Object Detectors: A Reviewcited by 5
- 2025SEVA: Leveraging Single-Step Ensemble of Vicinal Augmentations for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.