Robust Anomaly Detection in Industrial Environments via Meta-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection is fundamental for ensuring quality control and operational efficiency in industrial environments, yet conventional approaches face significant challenges when training data contains mislabeled samples-a common occurrence in real-world scenarios. This paper presents RAD, a robust anomaly detection framework that integrates Normalizing Flows with Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning to address the critical challenge of label noise in industrial settings. Our approach employs a bi-level optimization strategy where meta-learning enables rapid adaptation to varying noise conditions, while uncertainty quantification guides adaptive L2 regularization to maintain model stability. The framework incorporates multiscale feature processing through pretrained feature extractors and leverages the precise likelihood estimation capabilities of Normalizing Flows for robust anomaly scoring. Comprehensive evaluation on MVTec-AD and KSDD2 datasets demonstrates superior performance, achieving I-AUROC scores of 95.4% and 94.6% respectively under clean conditions, while maintaining robust detection capabilities above 86.8% and 92.1% even when 50% of training samples are mislabeled. The results highlight RAD's exceptional resilience to noisy training conditions and its ability to detect subtle anomalies across diverse industrial scenarios, making it a practical solution for real-world anomaly detection applications where perfect data curation is challenging.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.
Builds on
19 of 27 references.
References · 19
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 950
- 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2018GANomaly: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection via Adversarial Trainingcited by 409
- 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
- 2020Same Same But DifferNet: Semi-Supervised Defect Detection with Normalizing Flowscited by 212
- 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
- 2023Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 148
7 more
- 2022Asymmetric Student-Teacher Networks for Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 117
- 2021Mixed supervision for surface-defect detection: from weakly to fully supervised learningcited by 101
- 2020Toward Deep Supervised Anomaly Detection: Reinforcement Learning from Partially Labeled Anomaly Datacited by 42
- 2025Towards Real Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Via Confident Meta-Learningcited by 8
- 2024Self-Supervised Iterative Refinement for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Quality Controlcited by 5
- 2025Meta Learning-Driven Iterative Refinement for Robust Anomaly Detection in Industrial Inspectioncited by 5
- 2018Industrial Big Data Analytics: Challenges, Methodologies, and Applicationscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.