Tokens with Meaning: A Hybrid Tokenization Approach for Turkish
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tokenization shapes how language models perceive morphology and meaning in NLP, yet widely used frequency-driven subword tokenizers (e.g., Byte Pair Encoding and WordPiece) can fragment morphologically rich and agglutinative languages in ways that obscure morpheme boundaries. We introduce a linguistically informed hybrid tokenizer for Turkish that combines (i) dictionary-driven morphological segmentation (roots and affixes), (ii) phonological normalization that maps allomorphic variants to shared identifiers, and (iii) a controlled subword fallback for out-of-vocabulary coverage. Concretely, our released Turkish vocabulary contains 22,231 root tokens mapped to 20,000 canonical root identifiers (with leading spaces to mark word boundaries), 72 affix identifiers that cover 177 allomorphic surface forms, and 12,696 subword units; an orthographic case token preserves capitalization without inflating the vocabulary. We evaluate tokenization quality on the TR-MMLU dataset using two linguistic alignment metrics: Turkish Token Percentage (TR~%), the proportion of produced tokens that correspond to Turkish lexical/morphemic units under our lexical resources, and Pure Token Percentage (Pure~%), the proportion of tokens aligning with unambiguous root/affix boundaries. The proposed tokenizer reaches 90.29% TR~% and 85.80% Pure~% on TR-MMLU, substantially exceeding several general-purpose tokenizers. We further validate practical utility with downstream sentence embedding benchmarks under a strict random initialization control to isolate tokenizer inductive bias. Across four matched models (TurkishTokenizer, CosmosGPT2, Mursit, and Tabi), TurkishTokenizer outperforms all baselines on the Turkish STS Benchmark and achieves the strongest overall average on MTEB-TR. It also yields the strongest average accuracy on the TurBLiMP under a centroid-based proxy.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2025.
Builds on
19 of 33 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
- 2024EuroLLM: Multilingual Language Models for Europecited by 106
- 2021Superbizarre Is Not Superb: Derivational Morphology Improves BERT's Interpretation of Complex Wordscited by 63
- 2022Impact of Tokenization on Language Models: An Analysis for Turkishcited by 62
- 2025MorphBPE: A Morpho-Aware Tokenizer Bridging Linguistic Complexity for Efficient LLM Training Across Morphologiescited by 25
- 2024Evaluating Morphological Compositional Generalization in Large Language Modelscited by 19
7 more
- 2020Morphological Word Segmentation on Agglutinative Languages for Neural Machine Translationcited by 11
- 2024Setting Standards in Turkish NLP: TR-MMLU for Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 11
- 2023MorphPiece : A Linguistic Tokenizer for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025TurBLiMP: A Turkish Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 9
- 2024Introducing cosmosGPT: Monolingual Training for Turkish Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025Tokenization Standards for Linguistic Integrity: Turkish as a Benchmarkcited by 8
- 2024Arabic-Nougat: Fine-Tuning Vision Transformers for Arabic OCR and Markdown Extractioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Clause-Internal or Clause-External? Testing Turkish Reflexive Binding in Adapted versus Chain of Thought Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026HeceTokenizer: A Syllable-Based Tokenization Approach for Turkish Retrievalcited by 1
- 2026Benchmarking Source-Sensitive Reasoning in Turkish: Humans and LLMs under Evidential Trust Manipulationcited by 1
- 2026Supervision versus Demonstration-Based In-Context Learning for Multiword Expression Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Morpheus: A Morphology-Aware Neural Tokenizer and Word Embedder for Turkishcited by 0
- 2026The Functionalizer: Lossless Functional Decomposition for Subword Tokenizationcited by 0
- 2026Preserving Morphemes: Morphology-Guided Pre-Tokenization for Nepalicited by 0
- 2026Preserving Morphemes: Morphology-Guided Pre-Tokenization for Nepali27 Sep 2026
- 2026The Functionalizer: Lossless Functional Decomposition for Subword Tokenization7 Jul 2026
- 2026Morpheus: A Morphology-Aware Neural Tokenizer and Word Embedder for Turkish17 Jun 2026
- 2026Supervision versus Demonstration-Based In-Context Learning for Multiword Expression Classification5 Jun 2026
- 2026Benchmarking Source-Sensitive Reasoning in Turkish: Humans and LLMs under Evidential Trust Manipulation27 Apr 2026
- 2026HeceTokenizer: A Syllable-Based Tokenization Approach for Turkish Retrieval12 Apr 2026
- 2026Clause-Internal or Clause-External? Testing Turkish Reflexive Binding in Adapted versus Chain of Thought Large Language Models30 Jan 2026