Morphological Word Segmentation on Agglutinative Languages for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural machine translation (NMT) has achieved impressive performance on machine translation task in recent years. However, in consideration of efficiency, a limited-size vocabulary that only contains the top-N highest frequency words are employed for model training, which leads to many rare and unknown words. It is rather difficult when translating from the low-resource and morphologically-rich agglutinative languages, which have complex morphology and large vocabulary. In this paper, we propose a morphological word segmentation method on the source-side for NMT that incorporates morphology knowledge to preserve the linguistic and semantic information in the word structure while reducing the vocabulary size at training time. It can be utilized as a preprocessing tool to segment the words in agglutinative languages for other natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Experimental results show that our morphologically motivated word segmentation method is better suitable for the NMT model, which achieves significant improvements on Turkish-English and Uyghur-Chinese machine translation tasks on account of reducing data sparseness and language complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 130
- 2023MorphPiece : A Linguistic Tokenizer for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2022Linguistically inspired roadmap for building biologically reliable protein language modelscited by 7
- 2022Exploring Segmentation Approaches for Neural Machine Translation of Code-Switched Egyptian Arabic-English Textcited by 7
- 2023CompoundPiece: Evaluating and Improving Decompounding Performance of Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Tokens with Meaning: A Hybrid Tokenization Approach for Turkishcited by 7
- 2022How Effective is Byte Pair Encoding for Out-Of-Vocabulary Words in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 3
- 2022ImmunoLingo: Linguistics-based formalization of the antibody languagecited by 2
- 2024Pointer-Generator Networks for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Don't Copy That!cited by 1
- 2024How Important Is Tokenization in French Medical Masked Language Models?cited by 0
- 2025From Smor-re-brod to Subwords: Training LLMs on Danish, One Morpheme at a Timecited by 0
- 2025Tokens with Meaning: A Hybrid Tokenization Approach for Turkish19 Aug 2025
- 2025From Smor-re-brod to Subwords: Training LLMs on Danish, One Morpheme at a Time2 Apr 2025
- 2024Pointer-Generator Networks for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Don't Copy That!16 Mar 2024
- 2024How Important Is Tokenization in French Medical Masked Language Models?22 Feb 2024
- 2023MorphPiece : A Linguistic Tokenizer for Large Language Models14 Jul 2023
- 2023CompoundPiece: Evaluating and Improving Decompounding Performance of Language Models23 May 2023
- 2022Exploring Segmentation Approaches for Neural Machine Translation of Code-Switched Egyptian Arabic-English Text11 Oct 2022
- 2022ImmunoLingo: Linguistics-based formalization of the antibody language26 Sep 2022
- 2022How Effective is Byte Pair Encoding for Out-Of-Vocabulary Words in Neural Machine Translation?10 Aug 2022
- 2022Linguistically inspired roadmap for building biologically reliable protein language models3 Jul 2022
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLP20 Dec 2021