mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tokenization Standards for Linguistic Integrity: Turkish as a Benchmark

arXiv 2502.07057 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tokenization is a fundamental preprocessing step in NLP, directly impacting large language models' (LLMs) ability to capture syntactic, morphosyntactic, and semantic structures. This paper introduces a novel framework for systematically evaluating tokenization strategies, addressing challenges in morphologically rich and low-resource languages. Using a Turkish dataset of 6,200 multiple-choice questions from the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark, the framework assesses tokenizers across five key metrics: vocabulary size, token count, processing time, language-specific token percentages (%TR), and token purity. These metrics provide a structured approach to evaluating how well tokenizers preserve linguistic structures. While %TR measures the proportion of valid words in the target language, %Pure assesses the alignment of tokens with meaningful linguistic units, such as roots and valid morphemes, minimizing semantic fragmentation. The findings reveal that %TR, introduced as a critical metric, exhibits a stronger correlation with downstream performance (e.g., MMLU scores) than token purity, emphasizing its role in improving model accuracy. Additionally, larger model parameters do not necessarily yield better tokenization quality or enhanced results, highlighting the importance of tailored tokenization strategies that prioritize linguistic alignment. This framework sets a new standard for developing robust tokenization methods optimized for morphologically complex and low-resource languages. Future work will refine morphological analysis, explore domain-specific customizations, and conduct cross-linguistic evaluations to further enhance tokenization practices.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  2. 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 313
  3. 2024EuroLLM: Multilingual Language Models for Europecited by 103
  4. 2024Tokenization Is More Than Compressioncited by 87
  5. 2018How Much Does Tokenization Affect Neural Machine Translation?cited by 26
  6. 2023How do different tokenizers perform on downstream tasks in scriptio continua languages?: A case study in Japanesecited by 20
  7. 2024Setting Standards in Turkish NLP: TR-MMLU for Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.