Two Birds with One Stone: Multi-Task Detection and Attribution of LLM-Generated Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4 and Llama, have demonstrated remarkable abilities in generating natural language. However, they also pose security and integrity challenges. Existing countermeasures primarily focus on distinguishing AI-generated content from human-written text, with most solutions tailored for English. Meanwhile, authorship attribution--determining which specific LLM produced a given text--has received comparatively little attention despite its importance in forensic analysis. In this paper, we present DA-MTL, a multi-task learning framework that simultaneously addresses both text detection and authorship attribution. We evaluate DA-MTL on nine datasets and four backbone models, demonstrating its strong performance across multiple languages and LLM sources. Our framework captures each task's unique characteristics and shares insights between them, which boosts performance in both tasks. Additionally, we conduct a thorough analysis of cross-modal and cross-lingual patterns and assess the framework's robustness against adversarial obfuscation techniques. Our findings offer valuable insights into LLM behavior and the generalization of both detection and authorship attribution.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2025.
Builds on
47 of 73 references.
References · 47
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
35 more
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 648
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 399
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 387
- 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 375
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 166
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
- 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 121
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websitescited by 109
- 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
- 2023Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Reviewcited by 83
- 2022Democratizing Neural Machine Translation with OPUS-MTcited by 58
- 2021Artificial Text Detection via Examining the Topology of Attention Mapscited by 49
- 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
- 2023ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT modelscited by 42
- 2024Can Large Language Models Identify Authorship?cited by 41
- 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 40
- 2024Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representationscited by 40
- 2023Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websitescited by 38
- 2023Beyond the Safeguards: Exploring the Security Risks of ChatGPTcited by 36
- 2023On the Detectability of ChatGPT Content: Benchmarking, Methodology, and Evaluation through the Lens of Academic Writingcited by 27
- 2023Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Textcited by 27
- 2023Generating Phishing Attacks using ChatGPTcited by 16
- 2023Neural Authorship Attribution: Stylometric Analysis on Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2021DeepStyle: User Style Embedding for Authorship Attribution of Short Textscited by 10
- 2014Fighting Authorship Linkability with Crowdsourcingcited by 8
- 2024Enhancing Text Authenticity: A Novel Hybrid Approach for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 7
- 2023On the Origin of LLMs: An Evolutionary Tree and Graph for 15,821 Large Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.