mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MedAtlas: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Round, Multi-Task Medical Reasoning Across Diverse Imaging Modalities and Clinical Text

arXiv 2508.10947 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence has demonstrated significant potential in clinical decision-making; however, developing models capable of adapting to diverse real-world scenarios and performing complex diagnostic reasoning remains a major challenge. Existing medical multi-modal benchmarks are typically limited to single-image, single-turn tasks, lacking multi-modal medical image integration and failing to capture the longitudinal and multi-modal interactive nature inherent to clinical practice. To address this gap, we introduce MedAtlas, a novel benchmark framework designed to evaluate large language models on realistic medical reasoning tasks. MedAtlas is characterized by four key features: multi-turn dialogue, multi-modal medical image interaction, multi-task integration, and high clinical fidelity. It supports four core tasks: open-ended multi-turn question answering, closed-ended multi-turn question answering, multi-image joint reasoning, and comprehensive disease diagnosis. Each case is derived from real diagnostic workflows and incorporates temporal interactions between textual medical histories and multiple imaging modalities, including CT, MRI, PET, ultrasound, and X-ray, requiring models to perform deep integrative reasoning across images and clinical texts. MedAtlas provides expert-annotated gold standards for all tasks. Furthermore, we propose two novel evaluation metrics: Round Chain Accuracy and Error Propagation Resistance. Benchmark results with existing multi-modal models reveal substantial performance gaps in multi-stage clinical reasoning. MedAtlas establishes a challenging evaluation platform to advance the development of robust and trustworthy medical AI.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.

Builds on

10 of 29 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  3. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  4. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  5. 2023MIMIC-IT: Multi-Modal In-Context Instruction Tuningcited by 267
  6. 20196G Wireless Communication Systems: Applications, Requirements, Technologies, Challenges, and Research Directionscited by 34
  7. 2023Lifting uniform learners via distributional decompositioncited by 8
  8. 2023Control of a Back-Support Exoskeleton to Assist Carrying Activitiescited by 1
  9. 2024Maintenance cost assessment for heterogeneous multi-component systems incorporating perfect inspections and waiting time to maintenancecited by 1
  10. 2024Mixed Static and Reconfigurable Metasurface Deployment in Indoor Dense Spaces: How Much Reconfigurability is Needed?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Med-CMR: A Fine-Grained Benchmark Integrating Visual Evidence and Clinical Logic for Medical Complex Multimodal Reasoning
  2. 2025A Medical Multimodal Diagnostic Framework Integrating Vision-Language Models and Logic Tree Reasoning
  3. 2025MedTVT-R1: A Multimodal LLM Empowering Medical Reasoning and Diagnosis
  4. 2026Evaluating GPT-5 as a Multimodal Clinical Reasoner: A Landscape Commentary
  5. 2025Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications
  6. 2026MedQA-MM: Shortcuts Behind Medical Visual Reasoning
  7. 2026Medical thinking with multiple images
  8. 2026MedReaMM: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Expert-Level Clinical Diagnostic Synthesis