mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MetAdv: A Unified and Interactive Adversarial Testing Platform for Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2508.06534 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating and ensuring the adversarial robustness of autonomous driving (AD) systems is a critical and unresolved challenge. This paper introduces MetAdv, a novel adversarial testing platform that enables realistic, dynamic, and interactive evaluation by tightly integrating virtual simulation with physical vehicle feedback. At its core, MetAdv establishes a hybrid virtual-physical sandbox, within which we design a three-layer closed-loop testing environment with dynamic adversarial test evolution. This architecture facilitates end-to-end adversarial evaluation, ranging from high-level unified adversarial generation, through mid-level simulation-based interaction, to low-level execution on physical vehicles. Additionally, MetAdv supports a broad spectrum of AD tasks, algorithmic paradigms (e.g., modular deep learning pipelines, end-to-end learning, vision-language models). It supports flexible 3D vehicle modeling and seamless transitions between simulated and physical environments, with built-in compatibility for commercial platforms such as Apollo and Tesla. A key feature of MetAdv is its human-in-the-loop capability: besides flexible environmental configuration for more customized evaluation, it enables real-time capture of physiological signals and behavioral feedback from drivers, offering new insights into human-machine trust under adversarial conditions. We believe MetAdv can offer a scalable and unified framework for adversarial assessment, paving the way for safer AD.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 32 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

32 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving23 Jan
  2. 2024Visual Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving27 Nov
  3. 2024Attack End-to-End Autonomous Driving through Module-Wise Noise12 Sep
  4. 2022SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles20 Jun

Other references · 28

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  5. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  6. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  7. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  8. 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 622
  9. 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 490
  10. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 290
  11. 2020SMOKE: Single-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detection via Keypoint Estimationcited by 204
  12. 2021Dual Attention Suppression Attack: Generate Adversarial Camouflage in Physical Worldcited by 127
16 more
  1. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
  2. 2018Baidu Apollo EM Motion Plannercited by 100
  3. 2021RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training Techniquescited by 79
  4. 2022Parallel Rectangle Flip Attack: A Query-based Black-box Attack against Object Detectioncited by 79
  5. 2021FCA: Learning a 3D Full-coverage Vehicle Camouflage for Multi-view Physical Adversarial Attackcited by 74
  6. 2020Efficient Adversarial Attacks for Visual Object Trackingcited by 66
  7. 2023X-Adv: Physical Adversarial Object Attacks against X-ray Prohibited Item Detectioncited by 59
  8. 2022A Large-scale Multiple-objective Method for Black-box Attack against Object Detectioncited by 55
  9. 2021A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustnesscited by 42
  10. 2021Harnessing Perceptual Adversarial Patches for Crowd Countingcited by 39
  11. 20193D BAT: A Semi-Automatic, Web-based 3D Annotation Toolbox for Full-Surround, Multi-Modal Data Streamscited by 36
  12. 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
  13. 20223D Object Detection with a Self-supervised Lidar Scene Flow Backbonecited by 19
  14. 2024LanEvil: Benchmarking the Robustness of Lane Detection to Environmental Illusionscited by 18
  15. 2022Real-Time and Robust 3D Object Detection Within Road-Side LiDARs Using Domain Adaptationcited by 10
  16. 2018An Auto-tuning Framework for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024AdvDiffuser: Generating Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios via Guided Diffusion
  2. 2026Real-Time Evaluation of Autonomous Systems under Adversarial Attacks
  3. 2021Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning for Improving the Robustness of Multi-agent Autonomous Driving Policies
  4. 2025Driving in Corner Case: A Real-World Adversarial Closed-Loop Evaluation Platform for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Learning Responsibility-Attributed Adversarial Scenarios for Testing Autonomous Vehicles
  6. 2024Efficient Domain Augmentation for Autonomous Driving Testing Using Diffusion Models
  7. 2026Evaluation as Evolution: Transforming Adversarial Diffusion into Closed-Loop Curricula for Autonomous Vehicles
  8. 2026Comparative Analysis of Patch Attack on VLM-Based Autonomous Driving Architectures