mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measuring and Predicting Where and When Pathologists Focus their Visual Attention while Grading Whole Slide Images of Cancer

arXiv 2508.01668 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2025eess.IV cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to predict the attention of expert pathologists could lead to decision support systems for better pathology training. We developed methods to predict the spatio-temporal (where and when) movements of pathologists' attention as they grade whole slide images (WSIs) of prostate cancer. We characterize a pathologist's attention trajectory by their x, y, and m (magnification) movements of a viewport as they navigate WSIs using a digital microscope. This information was obtained from 43 pathologists across 123 WSIs, and we consider the task of predicting the pathologist attention scanpaths constructed from the viewport centers. We introduce a fixation extraction algorithm that simplifies an attention trajectory by extracting fixations in the pathologist's viewing while preserving semantic information, and we use these pre-processed data to train and test a two-stage model to predict the dynamic (scanpath) allocation of attention during WSI reading via intermediate attention heatmap prediction. In the first stage, a transformer-based sub-network predicts the attention heatmaps (static attention) across different magnifications. In the second stage, we predict the attention scanpath by sequentially modeling the next fixation points in an autoregressive manner using a transformer-based approach, starting at the WSI center and leveraging multi-magnification feature representations from the first stage. Experimental results show that our scanpath prediction model outperforms chance and baseline models. Tools developed from this model could assist pathology trainees in learning to allocate their attention during WSI reading like an expert.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 63 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  6. 2015Visual Saliency Based on Multiscale Deep Featurescited by 185
  7. 2016What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?cited by 185
  8. 2022Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning on Diverse Pathology Datasetscited by 150
  9. 2016Predicting Human Eye Fixations via an LSTM-based Saliency Attentive Modelcited by 91
  10. 2019Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies using Deep Learningcited by 69
  11. 2020Predicting Goal-directed Human Attention Using Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  12. 2022Follow My Eye: Using Gaze to Supervise Computer-Aided Diagnosiscited by 38
10 more
  1. 2023Gazeformer: Scalable, Effective and Fast Prediction of Goal-Directed Human Attentioncited by 38
  2. 2023TempSAL -- Uncovering Temporal Information for Deep Saliency Predictioncited by 25
  3. 2016Top-down Visual Saliency Guided by Captionscited by 22
  4. 2023Unifying Top-down and Bottom-up Scanpath Prediction Using Transformerscited by 22
  5. 2022Target-absent Human Attentioncited by 20
  6. 2024Beyond Average: Individualized Visual Scanpath Predictioncited by 12
  7. 2020Automated Detection of Cribriform Growth Patterns in Prostate Histology Imagescited by 4
  8. 2024Decoding the visual attention of pathologists to reveal their level of expertisecited by 3
  9. 2022Visual attention analysis of pathologists examining whole slide images of Prostate cancercited by 2
  10. 2015A dense subgraph based algorithm for compact salient image region detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.