DACTYL: Diverse Adversarial Corpus of Texts Yielded from Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing AIG (AI-generated) text detectors struggle in real-world settings despite succeeding in internal testing, suggesting that they may not be robust enough. We rigorously examine the machine-learning procedure to build these detectors to address this. Most current AIG text detection datasets focus on zero-shot generations, but little work has been done on few-shot or one-shot generations, where LLMs are given human texts as an example. In response, we introduce the Diverse Adversarial Corpus of Texts Yielded from Language models (DACTYL), a challenging AIG text detection dataset focusing on one-shot/few-shot generations. We also include texts from domain-specific continued-pre-trained (CPT) language models, where we fully train all parameters using a memory-efficient optimization approach. Many existing AIG text detectors struggle significantly on our dataset, indicating a potential vulnerability to one-shot/few-shot and CPT-generated texts. We also train our own classifiers using two approaches: standard binary cross-entropy (BCE) optimization and a more recent approach, deep X-risk optimization (DXO). While BCE-trained classifiers marginally outperform DXO classifiers on the DACTYL test set, the latter excels on out-of-distribution (OOD) texts. In our mock deployment scenario in student essay detection with an OOD student essay dataset, the best DXO classifier outscored the best BCE-trained classifier by 50.56 macro-F1 score points at the lowest false positive rates for both. Our results indicate that DXO classifiers generalize better without overfitting to the test set. Our experiments highlight several areas of improvement for AIG text detectors.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.
Builds on
46 of 105 references.
References · 46
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,167
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
34 more
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 649
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
- 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 411
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
- 2019Well-Read Students Learn Better: On the Importance of Pre-training Compact Modelscited by 120
- 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
- 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2021Generalization in NLI: Ways (Not) To Go Beyond Simple Heuristicscited by 67
- 2024A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalancecited by 57
- 2024APOLLO: SGD-like Memory, AdamW-level Performancecited by 54
- 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 52
- 2024LLM-as-a-Coauthor: Can Mixed Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text Be Detected?cited by 49
- 2020A Decade of Social Bot Detectioncited by 48
- 2020Advanced Graph and Sequence Neural Networks for Molecular Property Prediction and Drug Discoverycited by 46
- 2023Overview of AuTexTification at IberLEF 2023: Detection and Attribution of Machine-Generated Text in Multiple Domainscited by 31
- 2022When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence Guaranteecited by 29
- 2024Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputscited by 27
- 2024The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipediacited by 22
- 2023LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimizationcited by 15
- 2024MultiSocial: Multilingual Benchmark of Machine-Generated Text Detection of Social-Media Textscited by 14
- 2023TextDescriptives: A Python package for calculating a large variety of metrics from textcited by 13
- 2024Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detectioncited by 10
- 2024DREsS: Dataset for Rubric-based Essay Scoring on EFL Writingcited by 7
- 2025GenAI Content Detection Task 3: Cross-Domain Machine-Generated Text Detection Challengecited by 7
- 2025Trans-EnV: A Framework for Evaluating the Linguistic Robustness of LLMs Against English Varietiescited by 4
- 2024Which LLMs are Difficult to Detect? A Detailed Analysis of Potential Factors Contributing to Difficulties in LLM Text Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shiftcited by 1
- 2026Fight Poison with Poison: Enhancing Robustness in Few-shot Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Team DACTYL at PAN 2026: Bayesian Data Mixing and Empirical X-risk Minimization for AI-text Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Team DACTYL at PAN 2026: Bayesian Data Mixing and Empirical X-risk Minimization for AI-text Detection19 Jul 2026
- 2026Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift23 Jun 2026
- 2026Fight Poison with Poison: Enhancing Robustness in Few-shot Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Training4 May 2026