mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DACTYL: Diverse Adversarial Corpus of Texts Yielded from Large Language Models

arXiv 2508.00619 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing AIG (AI-generated) text detectors struggle in real-world settings despite succeeding in internal testing, suggesting that they may not be robust enough. We rigorously examine the machine-learning procedure to build these detectors to address this. Most current AIG text detection datasets focus on zero-shot generations, but little work has been done on few-shot or one-shot generations, where LLMs are given human texts as an example. In response, we introduce the Diverse Adversarial Corpus of Texts Yielded from Language models (DACTYL), a challenging AIG text detection dataset focusing on one-shot/few-shot generations. We also include texts from domain-specific continued-pre-trained (CPT) language models, where we fully train all parameters using a memory-efficient optimization approach. Many existing AIG text detectors struggle significantly on our dataset, indicating a potential vulnerability to one-shot/few-shot and CPT-generated texts. We also train our own classifiers using two approaches: standard binary cross-entropy (BCE) optimization and a more recent approach, deep X-risk optimization (DXO). While BCE-trained classifiers marginally outperform DXO classifiers on the DACTYL test set, the latter excels on out-of-distribution (OOD) texts. In our mock deployment scenario in student essay detection with an OOD student essay dataset, the best DXO classifier outscored the best BCE-trained classifier by 50.56 macro-F1 score points at the lowest false positive rates for both. Our results indicate that DXO classifiers generalize better without overfitting to the test set. Our experiments highlight several areas of improvement for AIG text detectors.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.

Builds on

46 of 105 references.

References · 46

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  7. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  8. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  9. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  11. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,167
  12. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
34 more
  1. 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 649
  2. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  3. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
  4. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  5. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  6. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
  7. 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 411
  8. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  9. 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224
  10. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
  11. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
  12. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
  13. 2019Well-Read Students Learn Better: On the Importance of Pre-training Compact Modelscited by 120
  14. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  15. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
  16. 2021Generalization in NLI: Ways (Not) To Go Beyond Simple Heuristicscited by 67
  17. 2024A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalancecited by 57
  18. 2024APOLLO: SGD-like Memory, AdamW-level Performancecited by 54
  19. 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 52
  20. 2024LLM-as-a-Coauthor: Can Mixed Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text Be Detected?cited by 49
  21. 2020A Decade of Social Bot Detectioncited by 48
  22. 2020Advanced Graph and Sequence Neural Networks for Molecular Property Prediction and Drug Discoverycited by 46
  23. 2023Overview of AuTexTification at IberLEF 2023: Detection and Attribution of Machine-Generated Text in Multiple Domainscited by 31
  24. 2022When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence Guaranteecited by 29
  25. 2024Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputscited by 27
  26. 2024The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipediacited by 22
  27. 2023LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimizationcited by 15
  28. 2024MultiSocial: Multilingual Benchmark of Machine-Generated Text Detection of Social-Media Textscited by 14
  29. 2023TextDescriptives: A Python package for calculating a large variety of metrics from textcited by 13
  30. 2024Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detectioncited by 10
  31. 2024DREsS: Dataset for Rubric-based Essay Scoring on EFL Writingcited by 7
  32. 2025GenAI Content Detection Task 3: Cross-Domain Machine-Generated Text Detection Challengecited by 7
  33. 2025Trans-EnV: A Framework for Evaluating the Linguistic Robustness of LLMs Against English Varietiescited by 4
  34. 2024Which LLMs are Difficult to Detect? A Detailed Analysis of Potential Factors Contributing to Difficulties in LLM Text Detectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.