mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Co-Producing AI: Toward an Augmented, Participatory Lifecycle

arXiv 2508.00138 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2025cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite efforts to mitigate the inherent risks and biases of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, these algorithms can disproportionately impact culturally marginalized groups. A range of approaches has been proposed to address or reduce these risks, including the development of ethical guidelines and principles for responsible AI, as well as technical solutions that promote algorithmic fairness. Drawing on design justice, expansive learning theory, and recent empirical work on participatory AI, we argue that mitigating these harms requires a fundamental re-architecture of the AI production pipeline. This re-design should center co-production, diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), and multidisciplinary collaboration. We introduce an augmented AI lifecycle consisting of five interconnected phases: co-framing, co-design, co-implementation, co-deployment, and co-maintenance. The lifecycle is informed by four multidisciplinary workshops and grounded in themes of distributed authority and iterative knowledge exchange. Finally, we relate the proposed lifecycle to several leading ethical frameworks and outline key research questions that remain for scaling participatory governance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.

Builds on

20 of 97 references.

References · 20

  1. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  6. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  7. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 528
  8. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  9. 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 123
  10. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 111
  11. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 101
  12. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
8 more
  1. 2020AI Lifecycle Models Need To Be Revised. An Exploratory Study in Fintechcited by 33
  2. 2022Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethicscited by 28
  3. 2020Flexible and Context-Specific AI Explainability: A Multidisciplinary Approachcited by 13
  4. 2021An Artificial Intelligence Life Cycle: From Conception to Productioncited by 11
  5. 2025LIVS: A Pluralistic Alignment Dataset for Inclusive Public Spacescited by 8
  6. 2024Towards a Privacy and Security-Aware Framework for Ethical AI: Guiding the Development and Assessment of AI Systemscited by 4
  7. 2025Negotiative Alignment: Embracing Disagreement to Achieve Fairer Outcomes -- Insights from Urban Studiescited by 4
  8. 2024From Efficiency to Equity: Measuring Fairness in Preference Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.