mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LIVS: A Pluralistic Alignment Dataset for Inclusive Public Spaces

arXiv 2503.01894 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.HCcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the Local Intersectional Visual Spaces (LIVS) dataset, a benchmark for multi-criteria alignment, developed through a two-year participatory process with 30 community organizations to support the pluralistic alignment of text-to-image (T2I) models in inclusive urban planning. The dataset encodes 37,710 pairwise comparisons across 13,462 images, structured along six criteria - Accessibility, Safety, Comfort, Invitingness, Inclusivity, and Diversity - derived from 634 community-defined concepts. Using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), we fine-tune Stable Diffusion XL to reflect multi-criteria spatial preferences and evaluate the LIVS dataset and the fine-tuned model through four case studies: (1) DPO increases alignment with annotated preferences, particularly when annotation volume is high; (2) preference patterns vary across participant identities, underscoring the need for intersectional data; (3) human-authored prompts generate more distinctive visual outputs than LLM-generated ones, influencing annotation decisiveness; and (4) intersectional groups assign systematically different ratings across criteria, revealing the limitations of single-objective alignment. While DPO improves alignment under specific conditions, the prevalence of neutral ratings indicates that community values are heterogeneous and often ambiguous. LIVS provides a benchmark for developing T2I models that incorporate local, stakeholder-driven preferences, offering a foundation for context-aware alignment in spatial design.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.

Builds on

26 of 72 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization21 Nov

Other references · 25

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  3. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  4. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
  5. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
  6. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 847
  7. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
  8. 2023Text-to-image Diffusion Models in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 264
  9. 2020Participatory Research for Low-resourced Machine Translation: A Case Study in African Languagescited by 159
  10. 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 120
  11. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
  12. 2024Learning Multi-dimensional Human Preference for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 102
13 more
  1. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 100
  2. 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 95
  3. 2023Human Feedback is not Gold Standardcited by 82
  4. 2024Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 66
  5. 2023AI's Regimes of Representation: A Community-centered Study of Text-to-Image Models in South Asiacited by 54
  6. 2024Language Model Alignment in Multilingual Trolley Problemscited by 46
  7. 2021The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safetycited by 34
  8. 2024The illusion of artificial inclusioncited by 34
  9. 2024Aligning Crowd Feedback via Distributional Preference Reward Modelingcited by 26
  10. 2021Preference learning along multiple criteria: A game-theoretic perspectivecited by 9
  11. 2019A preference learning framework for multiple criteria sorting with diverse additive value models and valued assignment examplescited by 6
  12. 2024Adaptive Alignment: Dynamic Preference Adjustments via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Pluralistic AIcited by 6
  13. 2024From Fake Perfects to Conversational Imperfects: Exploring Image-Generative AI as a Boundary Object for Participatory Design of Public Spacescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism: Operationalizing a Right to AI for Inclusive Public Space ↗
  2. 2024MIST: Mitigating Intersectional Bias with Disentangled Cross-Attention Editing in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  3. 2026The urban right to AI: Pluralistic co-design and governance of public space ↗
  4. 2025AI's Blind Spots: Geographic Knowledge and Diversity Deficit in Generated Urban Scenario
  5. 2026Designing streetscapes from street-view imagery using diffusion models
  6. 2026UrbanAlign: Post-hoc Semantic Calibration for VLM-Human Preference Alignment
  7. 2023Finetuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Fairness
  8. 2025Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models