An Artificial Intelligence Life Cycle: From Conception to Production
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Drawing on our experience of more than a decade of AI in academic research, technology development, industry engagement, postgraduate teaching, doctoral supervision and organisational consultancy, we present the 'CDAC AI Life Cycle', a comprehensive life cycle for the design, development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and solutions. It consists of three phases, Design, Develop and Deploy, and 17 constituent stages across the three phases from conception to production of any AI initiative. The 'Design' phase highlights the importance of contextualising a problem description by reviewing public domain and service-based literature on state-of-the-art AI applications, algorithms, pre-trained models and equally importantly ethics guidelines and frameworks, which then informs the data, or Big Data, acquisition and preparation. The 'Develop' phase is technique-oriented, as it transforms data and algorithms into AI models that are benchmarked, evaluated and explained. The 'Deploy' phase evaluates computational performance, which then apprises pipelines for model operationalisation, culminating in the hyperautomation of a process or system as a complete AI solution, that is continuously monitored and evaluated to inform the next iteration of the life cycle. An ontological mapping of AI algorithms to applications, followed by an organisational context for the AI life cycle are further contributions of this article.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2025Accountability Capture: How Record-Keeping to Support AI Transparency and Accountability (Re)shapes Algorithmic Oversightcited by 5
- 2025Assessing High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act: From Legal Requirements to Technical Verificationcited by 4
- 2025Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulationcited by 3
- 2024Identifying Potential Inlets of Man in the Artificial Intelligence Development Processcited by 2
- 2025LoCoML: A Framework for Real-World ML Inference Pipelinescited by 2
- 2025Co-Producing AI: Toward an Augmented, Participatory Lifecyclecited by 2
- 2025Data and AI governance: Promoting equity, ethics, and fairness in large language modelscited by 2
- 2026The Shrinking Lifespan of LLMs in Sciencecited by 1
- 2023Agave crop segmentation and maturity classification with deep learning data-centric strategies using very high-resolution satellite imagerycited by 0
- 2024Building an Ethical and Trustworthy Biomedical AI Ecosystem for the Translational and Clinical Integration of Foundational Modelscited by 0
- 2025Role and Use of Race in AI/ML Models Related to Healthcited by 0
- 2026The Shrinking Lifespan of LLMs in Science8 Apr 2026
- 2025Assessing High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act: From Legal Requirements to Technical Verification15 Dec 2025
- 2025Accountability Capture: How Record-Keeping to Support AI Transparency and Accountability (Re)shapes Algorithmic Oversight6 Oct 2025
- 2025Data and AI governance: Promoting equity, ethics, and fairness in large language models5 Aug 2025
- 2025Co-Producing AI: Toward an Augmented, Participatory Lifecycle31 Jul 2025
- 2025Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulation19 Jun 2025
- 2025Role and Use of Race in AI/ML Models Related to Health1 Apr 2025
- 2025LoCoML: A Framework for Real-World ML Inference Pipelines24 Jan 2025
- 2024Building an Ethical and Trustworthy Biomedical AI Ecosystem for the Translational and Clinical Integration of Foundational Models18 Jul 2024
- 2024Identifying Potential Inlets of Man in the Artificial Intelligence Development Process27 Feb 2024
- 2023Agave crop segmentation and maturity classification with deep learning data-centric strategies using very high-resolution satellite imagery21 Mar 2023