Towards a Privacy and Security-Aware Framework for Ethical AI: Guiding the Development and Assessment of AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence continues its unprecedented global expansion, accompanied by a proliferation of benefits, an increasing apprehension about the privacy and security implications of AI-enabled systems emerges. The pivotal question of effectively controlling AI development at both jurisdictional and organizational levels has become a prominent theme in contemporary discourse. While the European Parliament and Council have taken a decisive step by reaching a political agreement on the EU AI Act, the first comprehensive AI law, organizations still find it challenging to adapt to the fast-evolving AI landscape, lacking a universal tool for evaluating the privacy and security dimensions of their AI models and systems. In response to this critical challenge, this study conducts a systematic literature review spanning the years 2020 to 2023, with a primary focus on establishing a unified definition of key concepts in AI Ethics, particularly emphasizing the domains of privacy and security. Through the synthesis of knowledge extracted from the SLR, this study presents a conceptual framework tailored for privacy- and security-aware AI systems. This framework is designed to assist diverse stakeholders, including organizations, academic institutions, and governmental bodies, in both the development and critical assessment of AI systems. Essentially, the proposed framework serves as a guide for ethical decision-making, fostering an environment wherein AI is developed and utilized with a strong commitment to ethical principles. In addition, the study unravels the key issues and challenges surrounding the privacy and security dimensions, delineating promising avenues for future research, thereby contributing to the ongoing dialogue on the globalization and democratization of AI ethics.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behaviorcited by 10
- 2025Toward Effective AI Governance: A Review of Principlescited by 2
- 2025Co-Producing AI: Toward an Augmented, Participatory Lifecyclecited by 2
- 2026Smoothing the Black-Box: Signed-Distance Supervision for Black-Box Model Copyingcited by 0
- 2026Smoothing the Black-Box: Signed-Distance Supervision for Black-Box Model Copying28 Jan 2026
- 2025Co-Producing AI: Toward an Augmented, Participatory Lifecycle31 Jul 2025
- 2025Toward Effective AI Governance: A Review of Principles29 May 2025
- 2024SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior22 Oct 2024