LVM-GP: Uncertainty-Aware PDE Solver via coupling latent variable model and Gaussian process
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a novel probabilistic framework, termed LVM-GP, for uncertainty quantification in solving forward and inverse partial differential equations (PDEs) with noisy data. The core idea is to construct a stochastic mapping from the input to a high-dimensional latent representation, enabling uncertainty-aware prediction of the solution. Specifically, the architecture consists of a confidence-aware encoder and a probabilistic decoder. The encoder implements a high-dimensional latent variable model based on a Gaussian process (LVM-GP), where the latent representation is constructed by interpolating between a learnable deterministic feature and a Gaussian process prior, with the interpolation strength adaptively controlled by a confidence function learned from data. The decoder defines a conditional Gaussian distribution over the solution field, where the mean is predicted by a neural operator applied to the latent representation, allowing the model to learn flexible function-to-function mapping. Moreover, physical laws are enforced as soft constraints in the loss function to ensure consistency with the underlying PDE structure. Compared to existing approaches such as Bayesian physics-informed neural networks (B-PINNs) and deep ensembles, the proposed framework can efficiently capture functional dependencies via merging a latent Gaussian process and neural operator, resulting in competitive predictive accuracy and robust uncertainty quantification. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the method.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.
Builds on
36 of 48 references.
References · 36
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
- 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
- 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
- 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
- 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 355
- 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 343
24 more
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 170
- 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 164
- 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 140
- 2018Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 135
- 2019Modeling the Dynamics of PDE Systems with Physics-Constrained Deep Auto-Regressive Networkscited by 129
- 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
- 2018Adversarial Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2022Learning Operators with Coupled Attentioncited by 90
- 2021Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networkscited by 86
- 2017Numerical Gaussian Processes for Time-dependent and Non-linear Partial Differential Equationscited by 72
- 2022Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalizationcited by 57
- 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 54
- 2022Scalable Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Operator Networks using Randomized Priorscited by 39
- 2023Sparse Cholesky Factorization for Solving Nonlinear PDEs via Gaussian Processescited by 31
- 2020Machine Learning and Computational Mathematicscited by 22
- 2022AutoIP: A United Framework to Integrate Physics into Gaussian Processescited by 20
- 2023IB-UQ: Information bottleneck based uncertainty quantification for neural function regression and neural operator learningcited by 18
- 2024Positional Knowledge is All You Need: Position-induced Transformer (PiT) for Operator Learningcited by 17
- 2023Solving High Frequency and Multi-Scale PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 14
- 2021An augmented Lagrangian deep learning method for variational problems with essential boundary conditionscited by 11
- 2023Bi-fidelity Variational Auto-encoder for Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 8
- 2023DiffHybrid-UQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Differentiable Hybrid Neural Modelingcited by 5
- 2025Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Pre-Trained Neural Networks via Activation-Level Gaussian Processescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.